[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210628151708.138524-1-sxwjean@me.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 23:17:08 +0800
From: Xiongwei Song <sxwjean@...com>
To: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org,
longman@...hat.com, boqun.feng@...il.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Xiongwei Song <sxwjean@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] locking/lockdep: Fix meaningless usages output of lock classes
From: Xiongwei Song <sxwjean@...il.com>
When enabling CONFIG_LOCK_STAT, then CONFIG_LOCKDEP is forcedly enabled.
We can get output from /proc/lockdep, which currently includes usages of
lock classes. But the usages are meaningless, see the output below:
/ # cat /proc/lockdep
all lock classes:
ffffffff9af63350 ....: cgroup_mutex
ffffffff9af54eb8 ....: (console_sem).lock
ffffffff9af54e60 ....: console_lock
ffffffff9ae74c38 ....: console_owner_lock
ffffffff9ae74c80 ....: console_owner
ffffffff9ae66e60 ....: cpu_hotplug_lock
Only one usage context for each lock, this is because each usage is only
changed in mark_lock() that is in CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING defined section,
however in the test situation, it's not.
The fix is to move the usages reading and seq_print from
CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING undefined setcion to its defined section. Also,
locks_after list of lock_class is empty when CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
undefined, so do the same thing as what have done for usages of lock
classes.
Signed-off-by: Xiongwei Song <sxwjean@...il.com>
---
kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
index 806978314496..a1ec2652d492 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
@@ -70,23 +70,25 @@ static int l_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP
seq_printf(m, " OPS:%8ld", debug_class_ops_read(class));
#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
- seq_printf(m, " FD:%5ld", lockdep_count_forward_deps(class));
- seq_printf(m, " BD:%5ld", lockdep_count_backward_deps(class));
-#endif
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING)) {
+ seq_printf(m, " FD:%5ld", lockdep_count_forward_deps(class));
+ seq_printf(m, " BD:%5ld", lockdep_count_backward_deps(class));
- get_usage_chars(class, usage);
- seq_printf(m, " %s", usage);
+ get_usage_chars(class, usage);
+ seq_printf(m, " %s", usage);
+ }
seq_printf(m, ": ");
print_name(m, class);
seq_puts(m, "\n");
- list_for_each_entry(entry, &class->locks_after, entry) {
- if (entry->distance == 1) {
- seq_printf(m, " -> [%p] ", entry->class->key);
- print_name(m, entry->class);
- seq_puts(m, "\n");
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING)) {
+ list_for_each_entry(entry, &class->locks_after, entry) {
+ if (entry->distance == 1) {
+ seq_printf(m, " -> [%p] ", entry->class->key);
+ print_name(m, entry->class);
+ seq_puts(m, "\n");
+ }
}
}
seq_puts(m, "\n");
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists