[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YNnxjI7ermkZ0/Er@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 17:58:04 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] posix-cpu-timers: Bunch of fixes v2
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 01:41:48AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Frederic Weisbecker (7):
> posix-cpu-timers: Fix rearm racing against process tick
> posix-cpu-timers: Assert task sighand is locked while starting cputime counter
> posix-cpu-timers: Force next_expiration recalc after timer deletion
> posix-cpu-timers: Force next expiration recalc after itimer reset
> posix-cpu-timers: Remove confusing error code override
> posix-cpu-timers: Consolidate timer base accessor
> posix-cpu-timers: Recalc next expiration when timer_settime() ends up not queueing
Looks good, Thanks!
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists