linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: atmel: ATMEL drivers depend on HAS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 28 Jun 2021 17:35:53 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@...rochip.com>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Bo Shen <voice.shen@...el.com>,
        Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: atmel: ATMEL drivers depend on HAS_DMA

On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 09:03:25AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 6/28/21 6:02 AM, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
> > for review.  People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so 

> a. The entire email/patch was there. Should I put the ping _after_ the patch?
> Would that help?

Never send content free pings of any kind.  There's an "and" there.
Quoted patches can't be applied.

> b. What do you consider a reasonable time?  The patch was sent 28 days
> prior to this gentle ping.

As the mail you are replying to suggests this depends on the patch, some
things are more urgent than others, and in any case like I say content
free pings no matter how content free are just nose.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)