[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ee949a98-6998-2032-eb17-00ef8b8d911c@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 23:19:54 +0530
From: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@...dia.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
CC: <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<cohuck@...hat.com>, <jgg@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfio/mtty: Enforce available_instances
On 6/26/2021 2:56 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> The sample mtty mdev driver doesn't actually enforce the number of
> device instances it claims are available. Implement this properly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
> ---
>
> Applies to vfio next branch + Jason's atomic conversion
>
Does this need to be on top of Jason's patch?
Patch to use mdev_used_ports is reverted here, can it be changed from
mdev_devices_list to mdev_avail_ports atomic variable?
Change here to use atomic variable looks good to me.
Reviewed by: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@...dia.com>
> samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c b/samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c
> index ffbaf07a17ea..8b26fecc4afe 100644
> --- a/samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c
> +++ b/samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c
> @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ struct mdev_state {
> int nr_ports;
> };
>
> -static atomic_t mdev_used_ports;
> +static atomic_t mdev_avail_ports = ATOMIC_INIT(MAX_MTTYS);
>
> static const struct file_operations vd_fops = {
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> @@ -707,11 +707,20 @@ static int mtty_probe(struct mdev_device *mdev)
> {
> struct mdev_state *mdev_state;
> int nr_ports = mdev_get_type_group_id(mdev) + 1;
> + int avail_ports = atomic_read(&mdev_avail_ports);
> int ret;
>
> + do {
> + if (avail_ports < nr_ports)
> + return -ENOSPC;
> + } while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg(&mdev_avail_ports,
> + &avail_ports, avail_ports - nr_ports));
> +
> mdev_state = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mdev_state), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (mdev_state == NULL)
> + if (mdev_state == NULL) {
> + atomic_add(nr_ports, &mdev_avail_ports);
> return -ENOMEM;
> + }
>
> vfio_init_group_dev(&mdev_state->vdev, &mdev->dev, &mtty_dev_ops);
>
> @@ -724,6 +733,7 @@ static int mtty_probe(struct mdev_device *mdev)
>
> if (mdev_state->vconfig == NULL) {
> kfree(mdev_state);
> + atomic_add(nr_ports, &mdev_avail_ports);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> @@ -735,9 +745,9 @@ static int mtty_probe(struct mdev_device *mdev)
> ret = vfio_register_group_dev(&mdev_state->vdev);
> if (ret) {
> kfree(mdev_state);
> + atomic_add(nr_ports, &mdev_avail_ports);
> return ret;
> }
> - atomic_add(mdev_state->nr_ports, &mdev_used_ports);
>
> dev_set_drvdata(&mdev->dev, mdev_state);
> return 0;
> @@ -746,12 +756,13 @@ static int mtty_probe(struct mdev_device *mdev)
> static void mtty_remove(struct mdev_device *mdev)
> {
> struct mdev_state *mdev_state = dev_get_drvdata(&mdev->dev);
> + int nr_ports = mdev_state->nr_ports;
>
> - atomic_sub(mdev_state->nr_ports, &mdev_used_ports);
> vfio_unregister_group_dev(&mdev_state->vdev);
>
> kfree(mdev_state->vconfig);
> kfree(mdev_state);
> + atomic_add(nr_ports, &mdev_avail_ports);
> }
>
> static int mtty_reset(struct mdev_state *mdev_state)
> @@ -1271,8 +1282,7 @@ static ssize_t available_instances_show(struct mdev_type *mtype,
> {
> unsigned int ports = mtype_get_type_group_id(mtype) + 1;
>
> - return sprintf(buf, "%d\n",
> - (MAX_MTTYS - atomic_read(&mdev_used_ports)) / ports);
> + return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", atomic_read(&mdev_avail_ports) / ports);
> }
>
> static MDEV_TYPE_ATTR_RO(available_instances);
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists