[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YNoQ1d1hUyIh/qxz@google.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 11:11:33 -0700
From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
To: Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
Cc: bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, will@...nel.org,
saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org, ohad@...ery.com,
agross@...nel.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
robin.murphy@....com, joro@...tes.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, evgreen@...omium.org,
dianders@...omium.org, swboyd@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Update reserved memory map
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 01:17:35AM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> Subject: arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Update reserved memory map
That's very vague. Also personally I'm not a fan of patches that touch
SoC and board files with a commit message that only mentions the SoC, as
is frequently done for IDP boards. Why not split this in (at least) two,
one for adding the missing memory regions to the SoC, and one for the
IDP.
> Add missing regions and remove unused regions from the reserved memory
> map, as described in version 1.
What is this 'version 1'?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists