linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] TPM DEVICE DRIVER changes for v5.14

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 28 Jun 2021 15:35:16 -0400
From:   Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-integrity <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
        James Morris James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] TPM DEVICE DRIVER changes for v5.14


On 6/28/21 3:27 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 12:21 PM Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>> Correct, and the code (certs/Makefile) is surrounded by the check for
>> this particular file here, so it won't touch anything else:
> Ahh, I missed that part.
>
> Can we just make it really really obvious, and not use
> CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_KEY at all, then?
>
> IOW, make these literally be about "certs/signing_key.pem" and nothing
> else, so that when people grep for this, or look at the Makefile, they
> don't fall into that trap I fell into?

Yes, sir.

    Stefan


>
> That also would make it obvious that there are no pathname quoting issues etc.
>
>               Linus