[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210628234126.ijdbstfmlsycbqbp@kafai-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 16:41:26 -0700
From: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
To: Phi Nguyen <phind.uet@...il.com>
CC: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
<kpsingh@...nel.org>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>,
<syzbot+f1e24a0594d4e3a895d3@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: Do not reset the icsk_ca_initialized in
tcp_init_transfer.
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 01:20:19PM -0400, Neal Cardwell wrote:
> )
>
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 1:15 PM Phi Nguyen <phind.uet@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 6/29/2021 12:24 AM, Neal Cardwell wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Can you also please provide a summary of the event sequence that
> > > triggers the bug? Based on your Reported-by tag, I guess this is based
> > > on the syzbot reproducer:
> > >
> > > https://groups.google.com/g/syzkaller-bugs/c/VbHoSsBz0hk/m/cOxOoTgPCAAJ
> > >
> > > but perhaps you can give a summary of the event sequence that causes
> > > the bug? Is it that the call:
> > >
> > > setsockopt$inet_tcp_TCP_CONGESTION(r0, 0x6, 0xd,
> > > &(0x7f0000000000)='cdg\x00', 0x4)
> > >
> > > initializes the CC and happens before the connection is established,
> > > and then when the connection is established, the line that sets:
> > > icsk->icsk_ca_initialized = 0;
> > > is incorrect, causing the CC to be initialized again without first
> > > calling the cleanup code that deallocates the CDG-allocated memory?
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > neal
> > >
> >
> > Hi Neal,
> >
> > The gdb stack trace that lead to init_transfer_input() is as bellow, the
> > current sock state is TCP_SYN_RECV.
>
> Thanks. That makes sense as a snapshot of time for
> tcp_init_transfer(), but I think what would be more useful would be a
> description of the sequence of events, including when the CC was
> initialized previous to that point (as noted above, was it that the
> setsockopt(TCP_CONGESTION) completed before that point?).
+1. It needs to first explain when was the very first CC initialized.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists