[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YNlwjchu6QMVpc6g@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 08:47:41 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: 13145886936@....com
Cc: tj@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gushengxian <gushengxian@...ong.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernfs: Simplify if--else codes
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 11:01:55PM -0700, 13145886936@....com wrote:
> From: gushengxian <gushengxian@...ong.com>
>
> Simplify if--else codes.
>
> Signed-off-by: gushengxian <13145886936@....com>
> Signed-off-by: gushengxian <gushengxian@...ong.com>
> ---
> fs/kernfs/file.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/kernfs/file.c b/fs/kernfs/file.c
> index c75719312147..6bd531419f30 100644
> --- a/fs/kernfs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/kernfs/file.c
> @@ -644,10 +644,7 @@ static int kernfs_fop_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> * Both paths of the branch look the same. They're supposed to
> * look that way and give @of->mutex different static lockdep keys.
> */
> - if (has_mmap)
> - mutex_init(&of->mutex);
> - else
> - mutex_init(&of->mutex);
> + mutex_init(&of->mutex);
Please always read the code, and the comments, you are modifying before
you modify it :(
This is a sign you are doing "blind" code cleanups. Please stick with
drivers/staging/ for now as that part of the kernel accepts them much
easier than the rest of the kernel does.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists