lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 28 Jun 2021 16:06:01 +0900
From:   Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@...ux.dev>
To:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc:     HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也) 
        <naoya.horiguchi@....com>,
        Wang Wensheng <wangwensheng4@...wei.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "osalvador@...e.de" <osalvador@...e.de>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "rui.xiang@...wei.com" <rui.xiang@...wei.com>,
        HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁) 
        <k-hagio-ab@....com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm/sparse: set SECTION_NID_SHIFT to 6

On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 02:23:05PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 4:10 PM HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
> <naoya.horiguchi@....com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 11:05:17AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > On 27.04.21 10:30, Wang Wensheng wrote:
> > > > The section_mem_map member of struct mem_section stores some flags and
> > > > the address of struct page array of the mem_section.
> > > >
> > > > Additionally the node id of the mem_section is stored during early boot,
> > > > where the struct page array has not been allocated. In other words, the
> > > > higher bits of section_mem_map are used for two purpose, and the node id
> > > > should be clear properly after the early boot.
> > > >
> > > > Currently the node id field is overlapped with the flag field and cannot
> > > > be clear properly. That overlapped bits would then be treated as
> > > > mem_section flags and may lead to unexpected side effects.
> > > >
> > > > Define SECTION_NID_SHIFT using order_base_2 to ensure that the node id
> > > > field always locates after flags field. That's why the overlap occurs -
> > > > forgetting to increase SECTION_NID_SHIFT when adding new mem_section
> > > > flag.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 326e1b8f83a4 ("mm/sparsemem: introduce a SECTION_IS_EARLY flag")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Wang Wensheng <wangwensheng4@...wei.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >   include/linux/mmzone.h | 2 +-
> > > >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > > > index 47946ce..b01694d 100644
> > > > --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > > > @@ -1325,7 +1325,7 @@ extern size_t mem_section_usage_size(void);
> > > >   #define SECTION_TAINT_ZONE_DEVICE (1UL<<4)
> > > >   #define SECTION_MAP_LAST_BIT              (1UL<<5)
> > > >   #define SECTION_MAP_MASK          (~(SECTION_MAP_LAST_BIT-1))
> > > > -#define SECTION_NID_SHIFT          3
> > > > +#define SECTION_NID_SHIFT          order_base_2(SECTION_MAP_LAST_BIT)
> > > >   static inline struct page *__section_mem_map_addr(struct mem_section *section)
> > > >   {
> > > >
> > >
> > > Well, all sections around during boot that have an early NID are early ...
> > > so it's not an issue with SECTION_IS_EARLY, no? I mean, it's ugly, but not
> > > broken.
> > >
> > > But it's an issue with SECTION_TAINT_ZONE_DEVICE, AFAIKT.
> > > sparse_init_one_section() would leave the bit set if the nid happens to have
> > > that bit set (e.g., node 2,3). It's semi-broken then, because we force all
> > > pfn_to_online_page() through the slow path.
> > >
> > >
> > > That whole section flag setting code is fragile.
> >
> > Hi Wensheng, David,
> >
> > This patch seems not accepted or updated yet, so what's going on?
> >
> > We recently saw the exact issue on testing crash utilities with latest
> > kernels on 4 NUMA node system.  SECTION_TAINT_ZONE_DEVICE seems to be
> > set wrongly, and makedumpfile could fail due to this. So we need a fix.
> >
> > I thought of another approach like below before finding this thread,
> > so if you are fine, I'd like to submit a patch with this. And if you
> > like going with order_base_2() approach, I'm glad to ack this patch.
> >
> >   --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> >   +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> >   @@ -1358,14 +1358,15 @@ extern size_t mem_section_usage_size(void);
> >     *      which results in PFN_SECTION_SHIFT equal 6.
> >     * To sum it up, at least 6 bits are available.
> >     */
> >   +#define SECTION_MAP_LAST_SHIFT         5
> >    #define SECTION_MARKED_PRESENT         (1UL<<0)
> >    #define SECTION_HAS_MEM_MAP            (1UL<<1)
> >    #define SECTION_IS_ONLINE              (1UL<<2)
> >    #define SECTION_IS_EARLY               (1UL<<3)
> >    #define SECTION_TAINT_ZONE_DEVICE      (1UL<<4)
> >   -#define SECTION_MAP_LAST_BIT           (1UL<<5)
> >   +#define SECTION_MAP_LAST_BIT           (1UL<<SECTION_MAP_LAST_SHIFT)
> >    #define SECTION_MAP_MASK               (~(SECTION_MAP_LAST_BIT-1))
> >   -#define SECTION_NID_SHIFT              3
> >   +#define SECTION_NID_SHIFT              SECTION_MAP_LAST_SHIFT
> 
> Rather than make it dynamic, why not just make it 6 directly since
> that matches the comment about the maximum number of flags available.

Sounds nice to me, so here's a patch. Could you review this?

Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi
---
>From a146c9f12ae8985c8985a5861330f7528cd14fe8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 15:50:37 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] mm/sparse: set SECTION_NID_SHIFT to 6

Hagio-san reported that crash utility can see bit 4 in section_mem_map
(SECTION_TAINT_ZONE_DEVICE) to be set, even if we do not use any
ZONE_DEVICE ilke pmem or HMM.  This problem could break crash-related
toolsets and/or other memory analysis tools.

The root cause is that SECTION_NID_SHIFT is incorrectly set to 3,
while we use lower 5 bits for SECTION_* flags.  So bit 3 and 4 can be
overlapped by sub-field for early NID, and bit 4 is unexpectedly set
on (for example) NUMA node id is 2 or 3.

To fix it, set SECTION_NID_SHIFT to 6 which is the minimum number of
available bits of section flag field.

[1]: https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/commit/0b5435e10161345cf713ed447a155a611a1b408b

Fixes: 1f90a3477df3 ("mm: teach pfn_to_online_page() about ZONE_DEVICE section collisions")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v5.12+
Reported-by: Kazuhito Hagio <k-hagio-ab@....com>
Suggested-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>
---
 include/linux/mmzone.h | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
index fcb535560028..d6aa2a196aeb 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
@@ -1357,6 +1357,7 @@ extern size_t mem_section_usage_size(void);
  *      worst combination is powerpc with 256k pages,
  *      which results in PFN_SECTION_SHIFT equal 6.
  * To sum it up, at least 6 bits are available.
+ * SECTION_NID_SHIFT is set to 6 based on this fact.
  */
 #define SECTION_MARKED_PRESENT		(1UL<<0)
 #define SECTION_HAS_MEM_MAP		(1UL<<1)
@@ -1365,7 +1366,7 @@ extern size_t mem_section_usage_size(void);
 #define SECTION_TAINT_ZONE_DEVICE	(1UL<<4)
 #define SECTION_MAP_LAST_BIT		(1UL<<5)
 #define SECTION_MAP_MASK		(~(SECTION_MAP_LAST_BIT-1))
-#define SECTION_NID_SHIFT		3
+#define SECTION_NID_SHIFT		6
 
 static inline struct page *__section_mem_map_addr(struct mem_section *section)
 {
-- 
2.25.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ