| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <31cca461-eceb-651c-a702-5a9bc9b262b2@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 15:53:46 +0800
From: "Chen, Rong A" <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
To: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] Re: net/ceph/messenger_v1.c:1204:5: warning: stack
frame size (2880) exceeds limit (2048) in function 'ceph_con_v1_try_read'
On 6/28/2021 3:42 PM, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 7:16 AM kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ilya,
>>
>> FYI, the error/warning still remains.
>
> We won't be fixing the stack frame size warning here. Please add it to the
> allowlist.
Got it, thanks for the information.
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ilya
>
>>
>> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>> head: 62fb9874f5da54fdb243003b386128037319b219
>> commit: 2f713615ddd9d805b6c5e79c52e0e11af99d2bf1 libceph: move msgr1 protocol implementation to its own file
>> date: 7 months ago
>> config: powerpc64-randconfig-r034-20210628 (attached as .config)
>> compiler: clang version 13.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 59558129276098d62046c8cda92240d292cbfb1c)
>> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>> wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>> # install powerpc64 cross compiling tool for clang build
>> # apt-get install binutils-powerpc64-linux-gnu
>> # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=2f713615ddd9d805b6c5e79c52e0e11af99d2bf1
>> git remote add linus https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
>> git fetch --no-tags linus master
>> git checkout 2f713615ddd9d805b6c5e79c52e0e11af99d2bf1
>> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>> COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=powerpc64
>>
>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>>
>> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>> __do_insb
>> ^
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:541:56: note: expanded from macro '__do_insb'
>> #define __do_insb(p, b, n) readsb((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p), (b), (n))
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
>> In file included from net/ceph/messenger_v1.c:8:
>> In file included from include/net/sock.h:38:
>> In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
>> In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
>> In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
>> In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
>> In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:604:
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:45:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>> DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(insw, (unsigned long p, void *b, unsigned long c),
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:601:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
>> __do_##name al; \
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> <scratch space>:246:1: note: expanded from here
>> __do_insw
>> ^
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:542:56: note: expanded from macro '__do_insw'
>> #define __do_insw(p, b, n) readsw((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p), (b), (n))
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
>> In file included from net/ceph/messenger_v1.c:8:
>> In file included from include/net/sock.h:38:
>> In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
>> In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
>> In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
>> In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
>> In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:604:
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:47:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>> DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(insl, (unsigned long p, void *b, unsigned long c),
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:601:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
>> __do_##name al; \
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> <scratch space>:250:1: note: expanded from here
>> __do_insl
>> ^
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:543:56: note: expanded from macro '__do_insl'
>> #define __do_insl(p, b, n) readsl((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p), (b), (n))
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
>> In file included from net/ceph/messenger_v1.c:8:
>> In file included from include/net/sock.h:38:
>> In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
>> In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
>> In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
>> In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
>> In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:604:
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:49:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>> DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(outsb, (unsigned long p, const void *b, unsigned long c),
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:601:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
>> __do_##name al; \
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> <scratch space>:254:1: note: expanded from here
>> __do_outsb
>> ^
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:544:58: note: expanded from macro '__do_outsb'
>> #define __do_outsb(p, b, n) writesb((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p),(b),(n))
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
>> In file included from net/ceph/messenger_v1.c:8:
>> In file included from include/net/sock.h:38:
>> In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
>> In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
>> In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
>> In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
>> In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:604:
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:51:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>> DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(outsw, (unsigned long p, const void *b, unsigned long c),
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:601:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
>> __do_##name al; \
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> <scratch space>:4:1: note: expanded from here
>> __do_outsw
>> ^
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:545:58: note: expanded from macro '__do_outsw'
>> #define __do_outsw(p, b, n) writesw((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p),(b),(n))
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
>> In file included from net/ceph/messenger_v1.c:8:
>> In file included from include/net/sock.h:38:
>> In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
>> In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
>> In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
>> In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
>> In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:604:
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:53:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
>> DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(outsl, (unsigned long p, const void *b, unsigned long c),
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:601:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
>> __do_##name al; \
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> <scratch space>:8:1: note: expanded from here
>> __do_outsl
>> ^
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:546:58: note: expanded from macro '__do_outsl'
>> #define __do_outsl(p, b, n) writesl((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p),(b),(n))
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
>>>> net/ceph/messenger_v1.c:1204:5: warning: stack frame size (2880) exceeds limit (2048) in function 'ceph_con_v1_try_read' [-Wframe-larger-than]
>> int ceph_con_v1_try_read(struct ceph_connection *con)
>> ^
>> 14 warnings generated.
>>
>>
>> vim +/ceph_con_v1_try_read +1204 net/ceph/messenger_v1.c
>>
>> 1200
>> 1201 /*
>> 1202 * Read what we can from the socket.
>> 1203 */
>>> 1204 int ceph_con_v1_try_read(struct ceph_connection *con)
>> 1205 {
>> 1206 int ret = -1;
>> 1207
>> 1208 more:
>> 1209 dout("try_read start %p state %d\n", con, con->state);
>> 1210 if (con->state != CEPH_CON_S_V1_BANNER &&
>> 1211 con->state != CEPH_CON_S_V1_CONNECT_MSG &&
>> 1212 con->state != CEPH_CON_S_OPEN)
>> 1213 return 0;
>> 1214
>> 1215 BUG_ON(!con->sock);
>> 1216
>> 1217 dout("try_read tag %d in_base_pos %d\n", (int)con->in_tag,
>> 1218 con->in_base_pos);
>> 1219
>> 1220 if (con->state == CEPH_CON_S_V1_BANNER) {
>> 1221 ret = read_partial_banner(con);
>> 1222 if (ret <= 0)
>> 1223 goto out;
>> 1224 ret = process_banner(con);
>> 1225 if (ret < 0)
>> 1226 goto out;
>> 1227
>> 1228 con->state = CEPH_CON_S_V1_CONNECT_MSG;
>> 1229
>> 1230 /*
>> 1231 * Received banner is good, exchange connection info.
>> 1232 * Do not reset out_kvec, as sending our banner raced
>> 1233 * with receiving peer banner after connect completed.
>> 1234 */
>> 1235 ret = prepare_write_connect(con);
>> 1236 if (ret < 0)
>> 1237 goto out;
>> 1238 prepare_read_connect(con);
>> 1239
>> 1240 /* Send connection info before awaiting response */
>> 1241 goto out;
>> 1242 }
>> 1243
>> 1244 if (con->state == CEPH_CON_S_V1_CONNECT_MSG) {
>> 1245 ret = read_partial_connect(con);
>> 1246 if (ret <= 0)
>> 1247 goto out;
>> 1248 ret = process_connect(con);
>> 1249 if (ret < 0)
>> 1250 goto out;
>> 1251 goto more;
>> 1252 }
>> 1253
>> 1254 WARN_ON(con->state != CEPH_CON_S_OPEN);
>> 1255
>> 1256 if (con->in_base_pos < 0) {
>> 1257 /*
>> 1258 * skipping + discarding content.
>> 1259 */
>> 1260 ret = ceph_tcp_recvmsg(con->sock, NULL, -con->in_base_pos);
>> 1261 if (ret <= 0)
>> 1262 goto out;
>> 1263 dout("skipped %d / %d bytes\n", ret, -con->in_base_pos);
>> 1264 con->in_base_pos += ret;
>> 1265 if (con->in_base_pos)
>> 1266 goto more;
>> 1267 }
>> 1268 if (con->in_tag == CEPH_MSGR_TAG_READY) {
>> 1269 /*
>> 1270 * what's next?
>> 1271 */
>> 1272 ret = ceph_tcp_recvmsg(con->sock, &con->in_tag, 1);
>> 1273 if (ret <= 0)
>> 1274 goto out;
>> 1275 dout("try_read got tag %d\n", (int)con->in_tag);
>> 1276 switch (con->in_tag) {
>> 1277 case CEPH_MSGR_TAG_MSG:
>> 1278 prepare_read_message(con);
>> 1279 break;
>> 1280 case CEPH_MSGR_TAG_ACK:
>> 1281 prepare_read_ack(con);
>> 1282 break;
>> 1283 case CEPH_MSGR_TAG_KEEPALIVE2_ACK:
>> 1284 prepare_read_keepalive_ack(con);
>> 1285 break;
>> 1286 case CEPH_MSGR_TAG_CLOSE:
>> 1287 ceph_con_close_socket(con);
>> 1288 con->state = CEPH_CON_S_CLOSED;
>> 1289 goto out;
>> 1290 default:
>> 1291 goto bad_tag;
>> 1292 }
>> 1293 }
>> 1294 if (con->in_tag == CEPH_MSGR_TAG_MSG) {
>> 1295 ret = read_partial_message(con);
>> 1296 if (ret <= 0) {
>> 1297 switch (ret) {
>> 1298 case -EBADMSG:
>> 1299 con->error_msg = "bad crc/signature";
>> 1300 fallthrough;
>> 1301 case -EBADE:
>> 1302 ret = -EIO;
>> 1303 break;
>> 1304 case -EIO:
>> 1305 con->error_msg = "io error";
>> 1306 break;
>> 1307 }
>> 1308 goto out;
>> 1309 }
>> 1310 if (con->in_tag == CEPH_MSGR_TAG_READY)
>> 1311 goto more;
>> 1312 ceph_con_process_message(con);
>> 1313 if (con->state == CEPH_CON_S_OPEN)
>> 1314 prepare_read_tag(con);
>> 1315 goto more;
>> 1316 }
>> 1317 if (con->in_tag == CEPH_MSGR_TAG_ACK ||
>> 1318 con->in_tag == CEPH_MSGR_TAG_SEQ) {
>> 1319 /*
>> 1320 * the final handshake seq exchange is semantically
>> 1321 * equivalent to an ACK
>> 1322 */
>> 1323 ret = read_partial_ack(con);
>> 1324 if (ret <= 0)
>> 1325 goto out;
>> 1326 process_ack(con);
>> 1327 goto more;
>> 1328 }
>> 1329 if (con->in_tag == CEPH_MSGR_TAG_KEEPALIVE2_ACK) {
>> 1330 ret = read_keepalive_ack(con);
>> 1331 if (ret <= 0)
>> 1332 goto out;
>> 1333 goto more;
>> 1334 }
>> 1335
>> 1336 out:
>> 1337 dout("try_read done on %p ret %d\n", con, ret);
>> 1338 return ret;
>> 1339
>> 1340 bad_tag:
>> 1341 pr_err("try_read bad con->in_tag = %d\n", (int)con->in_tag);
>> 1342 con->error_msg = "protocol error, garbage tag";
>> 1343 ret = -1;
>> 1344 goto out;
>> 1345 }
>> 1346
>>
>> ---
>> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
>> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
> _______________________________________________
> kbuild-all mailing list -- kbuild-all@...ts.01.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to kbuild-all-leave@...ts.01.org
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists