linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ntfs: Fix validity check for file name attribute

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <F53B518A-A1D4-4ED3-9339-4625CAD98B2F@tuxera.com>
Date:   Mon, 28 Jun 2021 09:22:24 +0000
From:   Anton Altaparmakov <anton@...era.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:     "linux-ntfs-dev@...ts.sourceforge.net" 
        <linux-ntfs-dev@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "skhan@...uxfoundation.org" <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org" 
        <linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>,
        Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@...il.com>,
        "syzbot+213ac8bb98f7f4420840@...kaller.appspotmail.com" 
        <syzbot+213ac8bb98f7f4420840@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ntfs: Fix validity check for file name attribute

Hi Andrew,

Please can you merge this patch?  I am also marking it for stable.

Thanks a lot in advance!

Best regards,

	Anton

---

When checking the file name attribute, we want to ensure that it fits
within the bounds of ATTR_RECORD. To do this, we should check
that (attr record + file name offset + file name length) < (attr
record + attr record length).

However, the original check did not include the file name offset in
the calculation. This means that corrupted on-disk metadata might not
caught by the incorrect file name check, and lead to an invalid memory
access.

An example can be seen in the crash report of a memory corruption
error found by Syzbot:
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=a1a1e379b225812688566745c3e2f7242bffc246

Adding the file name offset to the validity check fixes this error and
passes the Syzbot reproducer test.

Reported-by: syzbot+213ac8bb98f7f4420840@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Tested-by: syzbot+213ac8bb98f7f4420840@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@...il.com>
Acked-by: Anton Altaparmakov <anton@...era.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
---
fs/ntfs/inode.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/ntfs/inode.c b/fs/ntfs/inode.c
index f5c058b3192c..4474adb393ca 100644
--- a/fs/ntfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ntfs/inode.c
@@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ static int ntfs_is_extended_system_file(ntfs_attr_search_ctx *ctx)
		}
		file_name_attr = (FILE_NAME_ATTR*)((u8*)attr +
				le16_to_cpu(attr->data.resident.value_offset));
-		p2 = (u8*)attr + le32_to_cpu(attr->data.resident.value_length);
+		p2 = (u8 *)file_name_attr + le32_to_cpu(attr->data.resident.value_length);
		if (p2 < (u8*)attr || p2 > p)
			goto err_corrupt_attr;
		/* This attribute is ok, but is it in the $Extend directory? */
-- 
2.25.1



-- 
Anton Altaparmakov <anton at tuxera.com> (replace at with @)
Lead in File System Development, Tuxera Inc., http://www.tuxera.com/
Linux NTFS maintainer