lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 28 Jun 2021 20:33:56 +0800
From:   Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To:     Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc:     Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: avoid attaching SB_ACTIVE flag during
 mount/remount

On 2021/6/28 20:29, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2021/6/23 23:49, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>> On 06/23, Chao Yu wrote:
>>> Hi Jaegeuk,
>>>
>>> On 2021/6/23 16:09, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>> Hi Chao,
>>>>
>>>> I'll remove this patch, since it breaks checkpoint=disable and recovery
>>>> flow that check SB_ACTIVE.
>>>
>>> Oh, sorry, is it due to changes in f2fs_disable_checkpoint()?
>>>
>>> So how about testing with changes f2fs_recover_orphan_inodes() and
>>> f2fs_recover_fsync_data()?
>>
>> I'm now nervous whether the test can miss corner cases. So, I don't think
>> we need to pour our time for this nice-to-have patch.
> 
> Well, could you please consider to check the fixed patch in 5.15 version?
> SB_ACTIVE in recovery flow is necessary for checkpoint disabling, it should

Sorry, I mean: if SB_ACTIVE in recovery flow is necessary...

Thanks,

> not be enabled only under CONFIG_QUOTA, right?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> On 05/25, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>>> Quoted from [1]
>>>>>
>>>>> "I do remember that I've added this code back then because otherwise
>>>>> orphan cleanup was losing updates to quota files. But you're right
>>>>> that now I don't see how that could be happening and it would be nice
>>>>> if we could get rid of this hack"
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/99cce8ca-e4a0-7301-840f-2ace67c551f3@huawei.com/T/#m04990cfbc4f44592421736b504afcc346b2a7c00
>>>>>
>>>>> Related fix in ext4 by
>>>>> commit 72ffb49a7b62 ("ext4: do not set SB_ACTIVE in ext4_orphan_cleanup()").
>>>>>
>>>>> f2fs has the same hack implementation in
>>>>> - f2fs_recover_orphan_inodes()
>>>>> - f2fs_recover_fsync_data()
>>>>> - f2fs_disable_checkpoint()
>>>>>
>>>>> Let's get rid of this hack as well in f2fs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cc: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
>>>>> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>     fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c |  3 ---
>>>>>     fs/f2fs/recovery.c   |  8 ++------
>>>>>     fs/f2fs/super.c      | 11 ++++-------
>>>>>     3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>>>>> index 6c208108d69c..a578c7d13d81 100644
>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>>>>> @@ -691,9 +691,6 @@ int f2fs_recover_orphan_inodes(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>>>>     	}
>>>>>     #ifdef CONFIG_QUOTA
>>>>> -	/* Needed for iput() to work correctly and not trash data */
>>>>> -	sbi->sb->s_flags |= SB_ACTIVE;
>>>>> -
>>>>>     	/*
>>>>>     	 * Turn on quotas which were not enabled for read-only mounts if
>>>>>     	 * filesystem has quota feature, so that they are updated correctly.
>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
>>>>> index 4b2f7d1d5bf4..4cfe36fa41be 100644
>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
>>>>> @@ -782,8 +782,6 @@ int f2fs_recover_fsync_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool check_only)
>>>>>     	}
>>>>>     #ifdef CONFIG_QUOTA
>>>>> -	/* Needed for iput() to work correctly and not trash data */
>>>>> -	sbi->sb->s_flags |= SB_ACTIVE;
>>>>>     	/* Turn on quotas so that they are updated correctly */
>>>>>     	quota_enabled = f2fs_enable_quota_files(sbi, s_flags & SB_RDONLY);
>>>>>     #endif
>>>>> @@ -811,10 +809,8 @@ int f2fs_recover_fsync_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool check_only)
>>>>>     	err = recover_data(sbi, &inode_list, &tmp_inode_list, &dir_list);
>>>>>     	if (!err)
>>>>>     		f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !list_empty(&inode_list));
>>>>> -	else {
>>>>> -		/* restore s_flags to let iput() trash data */
>>>>> -		sbi->sb->s_flags = s_flags;
>>>>> -	}
>>>>> +	else
>>>>> +		f2fs_bug_on(sbi, sbi->sb->s_flags & SB_ACTIVE);
>>>>>     skip:
>>>>>     	fix_curseg_write_pointer = !check_only || list_empty(&inode_list);
>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
>>>>> index 0a77808ebb8f..e7bd983fbddc 100644
>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
>>>>> @@ -1881,17 +1881,15 @@ static int f2fs_enable_quotas(struct super_block *sb);
>>>>>     static int f2fs_disable_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>>>>     {
>>>>> -	unsigned int s_flags = sbi->sb->s_flags;
>>>>>     	struct cp_control cpc;
>>>>>     	int err = 0;
>>>>>     	int ret;
>>>>>     	block_t unusable;
>>>>> -	if (s_flags & SB_RDONLY) {
>>>>> +	if (sbi->sb->s_flags & SB_RDONLY) {
>>>>>     		f2fs_err(sbi, "checkpoint=disable on readonly fs");
>>>>>     		return -EINVAL;
>>>>>     	}
>>>>> -	sbi->sb->s_flags |= SB_ACTIVE;
>>>>>     	f2fs_update_time(sbi, DISABLE_TIME);
>>>>> @@ -1909,13 +1907,13 @@ static int f2fs_disable_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>>>>     	ret = sync_filesystem(sbi->sb);
>>>>>     	if (ret || err) {
>>>>>     		err = ret ? ret : err;
>>>>> -		goto restore_flag;
>>>>> +		goto out;
>>>>>     	}
>>>>>     	unusable = f2fs_get_unusable_blocks(sbi);
>>>>>     	if (f2fs_disable_cp_again(sbi, unusable)) {
>>>>>     		err = -EAGAIN;
>>>>> -		goto restore_flag;
>>>>> +		goto out;
>>>>>     	}
>>>>>     	down_write(&sbi->gc_lock);
>>>>> @@ -1931,8 +1929,7 @@ static int f2fs_disable_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>>>>     out_unlock:
>>>>>     	up_write(&sbi->gc_lock);
>>>>> -restore_flag:
>>>>> -	sbi->sb->s_flags = s_flags;	/* Restore SB_RDONLY status */
>>>>> +out:
>>>>>     	return err;
>>>>>     }
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> 2.29.2
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ