[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210628123849.4gok3kf43wyjp2ix@box.shutemov.name>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 15:38:49 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
William Kucharski <william.kucharski@...cle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 09/33] mm: Add folio_try_get_rcu()
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 12:40:54PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> This is the equivalent of page_cache_get_speculative(). Also add
> folio_ref_try_add_rcu (the equivalent of page_cache_add_speculative)
> and folio_get_unless_zero() (the equivalent of get_page_unless_zero()).
>
> The new kernel-doc attempts to explain from the user's point of view
> when to use folio_try_get_rcu() and when to use folio_get_unless_zero(),
> because there seems to be some confusion currently between the users of
> page_cache_get_speculative() and get_page_unless_zero().
>
> Reimplement page_cache_add_speculative() and page_cache_get_speculative()
> as wrappers around the folio equivalents, but leave get_page_unless_zero()
> alone for now. This commit reduces text size by 3 bytes due to slightly
> different register allocation & instruction selections.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> Reviewed-by: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@...cle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists