linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.12 102/110] swiotlb: manipulate orig_addr when tlb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210628141828.31757-103-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 28 Jun 2021 10:18:20 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Bumyong Lee <bumyong.lee@...sung.com>,
        Chanho Park <chanho61.park@...sung.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Dominique MARTINET <dominique.martinet@...ark-techno.com>,
        Horia Geantă <horia.geanta@....com>,
        Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.12 102/110] swiotlb: manipulate orig_addr when tlb_addr has offset

From: Bumyong Lee <bumyong.lee@...sung.com>

commit 5f89468e2f060031cd89fd4287298e0eaf246bf6 upstream.

in case of driver wants to sync part of ranges with offset,
swiotlb_tbl_sync_single() copies from orig_addr base to tlb_addr with
offset and ends up with data mismatch.

It was removed from
"swiotlb: don't modify orig_addr in swiotlb_tbl_sync_single",
but said logic has to be added back in.

>From Linus's email:
"That commit which the removed the offset calculation entirely, because the old

        (unsigned long)tlb_addr & (IO_TLB_SIZE - 1)

was wrong, but instead of removing it, I think it should have just
fixed it to be

        (tlb_addr - mem->start) & (IO_TLB_SIZE - 1);

instead. That way the slot offset always matches the slot index calculation."

(Unfortunatly that broke NVMe).

The use-case that drivers are hitting is as follow:

1. Get dma_addr_t from dma_map_single()

dma_addr_t tlb_addr = dma_map_single(dev, vaddr, vsize, DMA_TO_DEVICE);

    |<---------------vsize------------->|
    +-----------------------------------+
    |                                   | original buffer
    +-----------------------------------+
  vaddr

 swiotlb_align_offset
     |<----->|<---------------vsize------------->|
     +-------+-----------------------------------+
     |       |                                   | swiotlb buffer
     +-------+-----------------------------------+
          tlb_addr

2. Do something
3. Sync dma_addr_t through dma_sync_single_for_device(..)

dma_sync_single_for_device(dev, tlb_addr + offset, size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);

  Error case.
    Copy data to original buffer but it is from base addr (instead of
  base addr + offset) in original buffer:

 swiotlb_align_offset
     |<----->|<- offset ->|<- size ->|
     +-------+-----------------------------------+
     |       |            |##########|           | swiotlb buffer
     +-------+-----------------------------------+
          tlb_addr

    |<- size ->|
    +-----------------------------------+
    |##########|                        | original buffer
    +-----------------------------------+
  vaddr

The fix is to copy the data to the original buffer and take into
account the offset, like so:

 swiotlb_align_offset
     |<----->|<- offset ->|<- size ->|
     +-------+-----------------------------------+
     |       |            |##########|           | swiotlb buffer
     +-------+-----------------------------------+
          tlb_addr

    |<- offset ->|<- size ->|
    +-----------------------------------+
    |            |##########|           | original buffer
    +-----------------------------------+
  vaddr

[One fix which was Linus's that made more sense to as it created a
symmetry would break NVMe. The reason for that is the:
 unsigned int offset = (tlb_addr - mem->start) & (IO_TLB_SIZE - 1);

would come up with the proper offset, but it would lose the
alignment (which this patch contains).]

Fixes: 16fc3cef33a0 ("swiotlb: don't modify orig_addr in swiotlb_tbl_sync_single")
Signed-off-by: Bumyong Lee <bumyong.lee@...sung.com>
Signed-off-by: Chanho Park <chanho61.park@...sung.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Reported-by: Dominique MARTINET <dominique.martinet@...ark-techno.com>
Reported-by: Horia Geantă <horia.geanta@....com>
Tested-by: Horia Geantă <horia.geanta@....com>
CC: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
index fe4c01c14ab2..e96f3808e431 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
@@ -724,11 +724,17 @@ void swiotlb_tbl_sync_single(struct device *hwdev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr,
 	int index = (tlb_addr - io_tlb_start) >> IO_TLB_SHIFT;
 	size_t orig_size = io_tlb_orig_size[index];
 	phys_addr_t orig_addr = io_tlb_orig_addr[index];
+	unsigned int tlb_offset;
 
 	if (orig_addr == INVALID_PHYS_ADDR)
 		return;
 
-	validate_sync_size_and_truncate(hwdev, orig_size, &size);
+	tlb_offset = (tlb_addr & (IO_TLB_SIZE - 1)) -
+		     swiotlb_align_offset(hwdev, orig_addr);
+
+	orig_addr += tlb_offset;
+
+	validate_sync_size_and_truncate(hwdev, orig_size - tlb_offset, &size);
 
 	switch (target) {
 	case SYNC_FOR_CPU:
-- 
2.30.2