lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210628143007.GD142768@li-24c3614c-2adc-11b2-a85c-85f334518bdb.ibm.com>
Date:   Mon, 28 Jun 2021 09:30:07 -0500
From:   "Paul A. Clarke" <pc@...ibm.com>
To:     kajoljain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com, atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        rnsastry@...ux.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, acme@...nel.org,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        jolsa@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf vendor events power10: Adds 24x7 nest metric events
 for power10 platform

On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 11:58:54AM +0530, kajoljain wrote:
> 
> 
> On 6/25/21 6:51 PM, Paul A. Clarke wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 05:29:48PM +0530, Kajol Jain wrote:
> >> Patch adds 24x7 nest metric events for POWER10.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>
> >> ---
> >>  .../arch/powerpc/power10/nest_metrics.json    | 491 ++++++++++++++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 491 insertions(+)
> >>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/powerpc/power10/nest_metrics.json
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/powerpc/power10/nest_metrics.json b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/powerpc/power10/nest_metrics.json
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000000..b79046cd8b09
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/powerpc/power10/nest_metrics.json
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,491 @@
> >> +[
> >> +    {
> >> +      "MetricName": "VEC_GROUP_PUMP_RETRY_RATIO_P01",
> >> +      "BriefDescription": "VEC_GROUP_PUMP_RETRY_RATIO_P01",
> > 
> > Is it possible to get better descriptions than just a restatement of the
> > name, or no description at all?
> > 
> > This comment obviously applies to almost all of the metrics herein.
> 
> Hi Paul,
>    Thanks for reviewing the patch. Sure I will remove description part for now.

My sentence didn't parse well, sorry...

What I really meant was more like "Is it possible to get better descriptions?
Having just a restatement of the name (or no description at all in some cases)
is not helpful."

So, can we provide better descriptions of the metrics?

PC

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ