lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 29 Jun 2021 12:46:34 +0100
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     "ruansy.fnst@...itsu.com" <ruansy.fnst@...itsu.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        "nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev" <nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "dm-devel@...hat.com" <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
        "darrick.wong@...cle.com" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        "dan.j.williams@...el.com" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        "david@...morbit.com" <david@...morbit.com>,
        "hch@....de" <hch@....de>, "agk@...hat.com" <agk@...hat.com>,
        "snitzer@...hat.com" <snitzer@...hat.com>,
        "rgoldwyn@...e.de" <rgoldwyn@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/9] mm: Introduce mf_dax_kill_procs() for fsdax case

On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 07:49:24AM +0000, ruansy.fnst@...itsu.com wrote:
> > But I think this is unnecessary; why not just pass the PFN into mf_dax_kill_procs?
> 
> Because the mf_dax_kill_procs() is called in filesystem recovery function, which is at the end of the RMAP routine.  And the PFN has been translated to disk offset in pmem driver in order to do RMAP search in filesystem.  So, if we have to pass it, every function in this routine needs to add an argument for this PFN.  I was hoping I can avoid passing PFN through the whole stack with the help of this dax_load_pfn().

OK, I think you need to create:

struct memory_failure {
	phys_addr_t start;
	phys_addr_t end;
	unsigned long flags;
};

(a memory failure might not be an entire page, so working in pfns isn't
the best approach)

Then that can be passed to ->memory_failure() and then deeper to
->notify_failure(), and finally into xfs_corrupt_helper().

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ