linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/101] 5.10.47-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YNsNJnEsTby87llx@debian>
Date:   Tue, 29 Jun 2021 13:08:06 +0100
From:   Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To:     Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/101] 5.10.47-rc1 review

Hi Sasha,

On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 10:24:26AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> 
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.47 release.
> There are 101 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed 30 Jun 2021 02:25:36 PM UTC.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/patch/?id=linux-5.10.y&id2=v5.10.46
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.

Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.1.1 20210615): 63 configs -> no failure
arm (gcc version 11.1.1 20210615): 105 configs -> no new failure
arm64 (gcc version 11.1.1 20210615): 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64 (gcc version 10.2.1 20210110): 2 configs -> no failure

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression.
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression.

Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>

--
Regards
Sudip