[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=who-5aibKGaCgn75KjDDJ_0OVR5SiXPJhvgvLT+BGN8kQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 14:08:53 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
Cc: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-integrity <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
James Morris James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] TPM DEVICE DRIVER changes for v5.14
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 1:20 PM Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Since there was still a new fix for the series [*], I'd rather refine
> the pull request without these patches, and not risk them being blocker
> for the rest of the commits.
They seemed to be just the last two commits at the end of the series,
so I could take everything up to 0178f9d0f60b ("tpm: Replace
WARN_ONCE() with dev_err_once() in tpm_tis_status()") perhaps?
I can do that even without a new pull request (I've done that kind of
thing before where I decide to pull everything but the last few
commits). But admittedly I'd prefer to see a new pull request just so
that I get a signed tag (which I wouldn't get if I just merged that
top commit).
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists