linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] drm: protect drm_master pointers in drm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e2ca777f-f185-688a-5813-0ff2e5025f77@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 Jun 2021 14:37:23 +0800
From:   Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@...il.com>
To:     Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>
Cc:     Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        ML dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
        skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] drm: protect drm_master pointers in drm_lease.c

On 30/6/21 8:16 am, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Hi Desmond,
> 
> Couple of small suggestions, with those the series is:
> Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>
> 
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 at 04:38, Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
> <desmondcheongzx@...il.com> wrote:
> 
>> @@ -128,13 +137,20 @@ bool drm_lease_held(struct drm_file *file_priv, int id)
>>          struct drm_master *master;
>>          bool ret;
>>
>> -       if (!file_priv || !file_priv->master || !file_priv->master->lessor)
>> +       if (!file_priv)
>>                  return true;
>>
>> -       master = file_priv->master;
>> +       master = drm_file_get_master(file_priv);
>> +       if (master == NULL)
>> +               return true;
>> +       if (!master->lessor) {
>> +               drm_master_put(&master);
>> +               return true;
> 
> Let's add a "ret = true; goto unlock;" here, so we can have a single
> drm_master_put() in the function.
> Nearly all code paths touched by this patch already follow this approach.
> 
>> @@ -154,10 +170,16 @@ uint32_t drm_lease_filter_crtcs(struct drm_file *file_priv, uint32_t crtcs_in)
>>          int count_in, count_out;
>>          uint32_t crtcs_out = 0;
>>
>> -       if (!file_priv || !file_priv->master || !file_priv->master->lessor)
>> +       if (!file_priv)
>>                  return crtcs_in;
>>
>> -       master = file_priv->master;
>> +       master = drm_file_get_master(file_priv);
>> +       if (master == NULL)
>> +               return crtcs_in;
>> +       if (!master->lessor) {
>> +               drm_master_put(&master);
>> +               return crtcs_in;
> 
> Ditto
> 
> Thanks
> Emil
> 

Sounds good to me, I'll revise these functions. Thanks for the review 
and suggestions, Emil.

Best wishes,
Desmond