[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YNwT4eO2LCIEXyiq@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 07:49:05 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
"Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@...dia.com>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [RFC] /dev/ioasid uAPI proposal
On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 04:08:02PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Compatibility is important, but when I look in the kernel code I see
> very few places that call wbinvd(). Basically all DRM for something
> relavent to qemu.
>
> That tells me that the vast majority of PCI devices do not generate
> no-snoop traffic.
Part of it is that we have no general API for it, because the DRM folks
as usual just tarted piling up local hacks instead of introducing
a proper API..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists