linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] kfence: skip DMA allocations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:32:43 +0530
From:   Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>
To:     Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, elver@...gle.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kfence: skip DMA allocations

On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 9:47 PM Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Allocation requests with __GFP_DMA/__GFP_DMA32 or
> SLAB_CACHE_DMA/SLAB_CACHE_DMA32 cannot be fulfilled by KFENCE, because
> they must reside in low memory, whereas KFENCE memory pool is located in
> high memory.
>
> Skip such allocations to avoid crashes where DMAable memory is expected.
>
> Fixes: 0ce20dd84089 ("mm: add Kernel Electric-Fence infrastructure")
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
> Cc: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 5.12+
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
>
> ---
>
> v2:
>  - added parentheses around the GFP clause, as requested by Marco
> ---
>  mm/kfence/core.c | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/kfence/core.c b/mm/kfence/core.c
> index 4d21ac44d5d35..f7ce3d876bc9e 100644
> --- a/mm/kfence/core.c
> +++ b/mm/kfence/core.c
> @@ -760,6 +760,14 @@ void *__kfence_alloc(struct kmem_cache *s, size_t size, gfp_t flags)
>         if (size > PAGE_SIZE)
>                 return NULL;
>
> +       /*
> +        * Skip DMA allocations. These must reside in the low memory, which we
> +        * cannot guarantee.
> +        */
> +       if ((flags & (__GFP_DMA | __GFP_DMA32)) ||
> +           (s->flags & (SLAB_CACHE_DMA | SLAB_CACHE_DMA32)))
> +               return NULL;
> +

I prefer to move this check at the top of the function.
Although it won't make much difference except avoiding atomic operations
in case this condition is true.

>         return kfence_guarded_alloc(s, size, flags);
>  }
>
> --
> 2.32.0.93.g670b81a890-goog
>
>