[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YNwljrHzOmD1V5be@ninjato>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 10:04:30 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Jie Deng <jie.deng@...el.com>,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
conghui.chen@...el.com, kblaiech@...lanox.com,
jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
Sergey Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, loic.poulain@...aro.org,
Tali Perry <tali.perry1@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
yu1.wang@...el.com, shuo.a.liu@...el.com,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10] i2c: virtio: add a virtio i2c frontend driver
> Is that position stable across kernel versions? We do have stable naming
> for PCI devices and for platform devices that are the parent of a virtio
> device, but I would expect the virtio device to be numbered in probe
> order instead.
For me, it would be good enough to know who (= which device) created
this adapter when I look at the name at runtime. I wouldn't require this
to be stable across kernel versions. In general, this is just an info
string with no guarantees. But maybe you have reasons to insist on it
being stable nonetheless.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists