| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 10:09:11 +0200
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
To: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT] regulator: hi6421v600: Fix getting wrong drvdata
that causes boot failure
Hi Axel,
Em Wed, 30 Jun 2021 15:42:46 +0800
Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com> escreveu:
> Since config.dev = pdev->dev.parent in current code, so
> dev_get_drvdata(rdev->dev.parent) actually returns the drvdata of the mfd
> device rather than the regulator. Fix it.
>
> Fixes: 9bc146acc331 ("regulator: hi6421v600: Fix setting wrong driver_data")
> Reported-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
> ---
> Hi Mauro,
> Thanks for your analysis.
> Could you check if this patch works if you think it's good.
> I don't mind applying your earlier fix or this one.
> (This one has less code change with single purpose fot the fix,
> and this patch does not has other dependency.)
Yeah, this fixed the issue:
[ 1.105691] spmi spmi-0: spmi_controller_wait_for_done: status 0x1
[ 1.111942] spmi spmi-0: spmi_write_cmd: id:0 slave_addr:0x202, wrote value: ff
[ 1.119344] spmi spmi-0: spmi_controller_wait_for_done: status 0x1
[ 1.125589] spmi spmi-0: spmi_write_cmd: id:0 slave_addr:0x203, wrote value: ff
[ 1.132992] spmi spmi-0: spmi_controller_wait_for_done: status 0x1
[ 1.139238] spmi spmi-0: spmi_read_cmd: id:0 slave_addr:0x212, read value: 00
[ 1.146461] spmi spmi-0: spmi_controller_wait_for_done: status 0x1
[ 1.152706] spmi spmi-0: spmi_write_cmd: id:0 slave_addr:0x212, wrote value: ff
[ 1.160103] spmi spmi-0: spmi_controller_wait_for_done: status 0x1
[ 1.166348] spmi spmi-0: spmi_read_cmd: id:0 slave_addr:0x213, read value: 00
[ 1.173570] spmi spmi-0: spmi_controller_wait_for_done: status 0x1
[ 1.179815] spmi spmi-0: spmi_write_cmd: id:0 slave_addr:0x213, wrote value: ff
[ 1.187723] spmi spmi-0: spmi_controller_wait_for_done: status 0x1
[ 1.193970] spmi spmi-0: spmi_read_cmd: id:0 slave_addr:0x51, read value: 08
[ 1.201114] spmi spmi-0: spmi_controller_wait_for_done: status 0x1
[ 1.207358] spmi spmi-0: spmi_read_cmd: id:0 slave_addr:0x16, read value: 03
[ 1.234794] spmi spmi-0: spmi_controller_wait_for_done: status 0x1
[ 1.241040] spmi spmi-0: spmi_read_cmd: id:0 slave_addr:0x51, read value: 08
[ 1.248182] spmi spmi-0: spmi_controller_wait_for_done: status 0x1
[ 1.254428] spmi spmi-0: spmi_read_cmd: id:0 slave_addr:0x16, read value: 03
[ 1.261560] ldo3: 1500 <--> 2000 mV at 1800 mV, enabled
...
hikey970 login:
And the regulators are also working:
$ lsusb
Bus 002 Device 002: ID 0451:8140 Texas Instruments, Inc. TUSB8041 4-Port Hub
Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
Bus 001 Device 003: ID 046d:c52b Logitech, Inc. Unifying Receiver
Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0451:8142 Texas Instruments, Inc. TUSB8041 4-Port Hub
Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
Thanks!
I'm OK on merging this version.
Tested-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
-
It would be better to merge this version either via Greg's tree or before
-rc1, in order to avoid conflicts with staging, as there will be a change
on this hunk:
@@ -252,13 +255,12 @@ static int hi6421_spmi_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return -ENOMEM;
mutex_init(&priv->enable_mutex);
- platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(regulator_info); i++) {
info = ®ulator_info[i];
config.dev = pdev->dev.parent;
- config.driver_data = info;
+ config.driver_data = priv;
config.regmap = pmic->regmap;
rdev = devm_regulator_register(dev, &info->desc, &config);
As a patch at staging will be doing:
- config.regmap = pmic->regmap;
+ config.regmap = regmap;
>
> Regards,
> Axel
> drivers/regulator/hi6421v600-regulator.c | 16 +++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/hi6421v600-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/hi6421v600-regulator.c
> index 9b162c0555c3..845bc3b4026d 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/hi6421v600-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/hi6421v600-regulator.c
> @@ -98,10 +98,9 @@ static const unsigned int ldo34_voltages[] = {
>
> static int hi6421_spmi_regulator_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> {
> - struct hi6421_spmi_reg_priv *priv;
> + struct hi6421_spmi_reg_priv *priv = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> int ret;
>
> - priv = dev_get_drvdata(rdev->dev.parent);
> /* cannot enable more than one regulator at one time */
> mutex_lock(&priv->enable_mutex);
>
> @@ -119,9 +118,10 @@ static int hi6421_spmi_regulator_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>
> static unsigned int hi6421_spmi_regulator_get_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> {
> - struct hi6421_spmi_reg_info *sreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> + struct hi6421_spmi_reg_info *sreg;
> unsigned int reg_val;
>
> + sreg = container_of(rdev->desc, struct hi6421_spmi_reg_info, desc);
> regmap_read(rdev->regmap, rdev->desc->enable_reg, ®_val);
>
> if (reg_val & sreg->eco_mode_mask)
> @@ -133,9 +133,10 @@ static unsigned int hi6421_spmi_regulator_get_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> static int hi6421_spmi_regulator_set_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
> unsigned int mode)
> {
> - struct hi6421_spmi_reg_info *sreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> + struct hi6421_spmi_reg_info *sreg;
> unsigned int val;
>
> + sreg = container_of(rdev->desc, struct hi6421_spmi_reg_info, desc);
> switch (mode) {
> case REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL:
> val = 0;
> @@ -159,7 +160,9 @@ hi6421_spmi_regulator_get_optimum_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
> int input_uV, int output_uV,
> int load_uA)
> {
> - struct hi6421_spmi_reg_info *sreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> + struct hi6421_spmi_reg_info *sreg;
> +
> + sreg = container_of(rdev->desc, struct hi6421_spmi_reg_info, desc);
>
> if (!sreg->eco_uA || ((unsigned int)load_uA > sreg->eco_uA))
> return REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL;
> @@ -252,13 +255,12 @@ static int hi6421_spmi_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> mutex_init(&priv->enable_mutex);
> - platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
>
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(regulator_info); i++) {
> info = ®ulator_info[i];
>
> config.dev = pdev->dev.parent;
> - config.driver_data = info;
> + config.driver_data = priv;
> config.regmap = pmic->regmap;
>
> rdev = devm_regulator_register(dev, &info->desc, &config);
Thanks,
Mauro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists