[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aa963629-f52f-d42b-de30-298f5755eb49@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 16:15:26 +0800
From: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
kan.liang@...el.com, yao.jin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf tools: Fix pattern matching for same substring
used in different pmu type
Hi Jiri, Hi Kan,
On 6/30/2021 5:47 AM, Liang, Kan wrote:
>
>
> On 6/29/2021 5:15 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 09:52:42AM +0800, Jin, Yao wrote:
>>
>> SNIP
>>
>>>>>>> + /*
>>>>>>> + * The pmu_name has substring tok. If the format of
>>>>>>> + * pmu_name is <tok> or <tok>_<digit>, return true.
>>>>>>> + */
>>>>>>> + p = pmu_name + strlen(tok);
>>>>>>> + if (*p == 0)
>>>>>>> + return true;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + if (*p != '_')
>>>>>>> + return false;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + ++p;
>>>>>>> + if (*p == 0 || !isdigit(*p))
>>>>>>> + return false;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + return true;
>>>>>>> +}
>>>>
>>>> hum, so we have pattern serch and then another function checking
>>>> if that search was ok..
>>>
>>> Yes, that's what this patch does.
>>>
>>> I understand that's convenient, because
>>>> it's on 2 different places
>>>
>>> Yes, on pmu_uncore_alias_match() and on parse-events.y.
>>>
>>> but could we have some generic solution,
>>>> line one function/search that returns/search for valid pmu name?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry, I don't understand this idea well. Would you like to further explain?
>>>
>>> Or can you accept the regex approach?
>>
>> I don't really have any suggestion, just would be great to have
>> this encapsulated in one function..
>
> Yes, I agree. One function is better.
>
> We just changed the design for the uncore PMU on SPR. There will be two PMU names for each uncore
> unit, a real name and an alias. The perf tool should handle both names. So we have to compare both
> names here.
> I think one generic function can facilitate the code rebase.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1624990443-168533-7-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com/
>
> Thanks,
> Kan
>
Thanks for the comments!
I'm now preparing v2. In v2 version, I will provide a new function 'perf_pmu__pattern_match which
wraps the matching and checking. Something like:
while ((pmu = perf_pmu__scan(pmu)) != NULL) {
if (!perf_pmu__pattern_match(pmu, pattern, $1)) {
...
}
}
I will post v2 soon.
Thanks
Jin Yao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists