[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0=A7WhiWBpX+yy6+haR84paXWUOO2=65uP9E82yNomoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 10:37:15 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@...il.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
alpha <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [CFT][PATCH] exit/bdflush: Remove the deprecated bdflush system call
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 10:28 PM Eric W. Biederman
<ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
>
>
> The bdflush system call has been deprecated for a very long time.
> Recently Michael Schmitz tested[1] and found that the last known
> caller of of the bdflush system call is unaffected by it's removal.
>
> Since the code is not needed delete it.
>
> [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/36123b5d-daa0-6c2b-f2d4-a942f069fd54@gmail.com
> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> ---
>
> I think we have consensus that bdflush can be removed. Can folks please
> verify I have removed it correctly?
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
We are traditionally somewhat inconsistent about whether to leave the
__NR_bdflush macro present in asm/unistd.h or to remove it when the
syscall is gone. Leaving it in place as you do is probably better here.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists