[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210630121307.GA5106@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:13:07 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Graeme Gregory <gg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Discussions about the Letux Kernel
<letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org>, kernel@...a-handheld.com,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: palmas: set supply_name after registering the
regulator
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 10:21:45PM +0200, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> There seems to be a deadlock in probing:
> e.g. ldo3_reg depends on vdds_1v8_main supply
> vdds_1v8_main depends on smps7_reg supply
> smps7_reg depends on vsys_cobra supply
> vsys_cobra depends on nothing
> This would normally lead to a simple chain as you described above. But
> ldo3_reg and smps7_reg share the same driver and can probe successfully or
> fail only in common.
I don't see any deadlock there? Just a straightforward set of
dependencies. Anything circular would clearly be a driver bug.
> Now if ldo3_reg defers probe through the new rule, smps7_reg is never
> probed successfully because it is the same driver. Hence vdds_1v8_main can
> not become available. And the Palmas continues to run in boot initialization
> until some driver (MMC) wants to switch voltages or whatever.
The driver should just register all the DCDCs before the LDOs, then
everything will sort itself out. It's *possible* you might see a system
trying to link things together regulators of the same type but that's
very unusual as it makes the system less efficient.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists