linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][next] trace: osnoise: Fix u64 less than zero comparison

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210630090544.13c0a4df@oasis.local.home>
Date:   Wed, 30 Jun 2021 09:05:44 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
Cc:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] trace: osnoise: Fix u64 less than zero comparison

On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 19:19:25 +0200
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com> wrote:

> > Addresses-Coverity: ("Unsigned compared against 0")
> > Fixes: bce29ac9ce0b ("trace: Add osnoise tracer")
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>  
> 
> Steven, can we merge the flags?

I don't usually do that. I just take the first patch that I apply.

This isn't that complex of a patch, do we need to do this?

-- Steve