[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <162506084535.395.4381491579446685180.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:47:25 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Paul E. McKenney" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <michel@...pinasse.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: core/rcu] rcu: Improve comments describing RCU read-side
critical sections
The following commit has been merged into the core/rcu branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 1893afd63409111c6edcee9d6e1196fc06cf4fd7
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/1893afd63409111c6edcee9d6e1196fc06cf4fd7
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
AuthorDate: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 11:18:01 -07:00
Committer: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
CommitterDate: Thu, 13 May 2021 09:13:23 -07:00
rcu: Improve comments describing RCU read-side critical sections
There are a number of places that call out the fact that preempt-disable
regions of code now act as RCU read-side critical sections, where
preempt-disable regions of code include irq-disable regions of code,
bh-disable regions of code, hardirq handlers, and NMI handlers. However,
someone relying solely on (for example) the call_rcu() header comment
might well have no idea that preempt-disable regions of code have RCU
semantics.
This commit therefore updates the header comments for
call_rcu(), synchronize_rcu(), rcu_dereference_bh_check(), and
rcu_dereference_sched_check() to call out these new(ish) forms of RCU
readers.
Reported-by: Michel Lespinasse <michel@...pinasse.org>
[ paulmck: Apply Matthew Wilcox and Michel Lespinasse feedback. ]
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index b071d02..f0eecb9 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -532,7 +532,12 @@ do { \
* @p: The pointer to read, prior to dereferencing
* @c: The conditions under which the dereference will take place
*
- * This is the RCU-bh counterpart to rcu_dereference_check().
+ * This is the RCU-bh counterpart to rcu_dereference_check(). However,
+ * please note that starting in v5.0 kernels, vanilla RCU grace periods
+ * wait for local_bh_disable() regions of code in addition to regions of
+ * code demarked by rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock(). This means
+ * that synchronize_rcu(), call_rcu, and friends all take not only
+ * rcu_read_lock() but also rcu_read_lock_bh() into account.
*/
#define rcu_dereference_bh_check(p, c) \
__rcu_dereference_check((p), (c) || rcu_read_lock_bh_held(), __rcu)
@@ -543,6 +548,11 @@ do { \
* @c: The conditions under which the dereference will take place
*
* This is the RCU-sched counterpart to rcu_dereference_check().
+ * However, please note that starting in v5.0 kernels, vanilla RCU grace
+ * periods wait for preempt_disable() regions of code in addition to
+ * regions of code demarked by rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock().
+ * This means that synchronize_rcu(), call_rcu, and friends all take not
+ * only rcu_read_lock() but also rcu_read_lock_sched() into account.
*/
#define rcu_dereference_sched_check(p, c) \
__rcu_dereference_check((p), (c) || rcu_read_lock_sched_held(), \
@@ -634,6 +644,12 @@ do { \
* sections, invocation of the corresponding RCU callback is deferred
* until after the all the other CPUs exit their critical sections.
*
+ * In v5.0 and later kernels, synchronize_rcu() and call_rcu() also
+ * wait for regions of code with preemption disabled, including regions of
+ * code with interrupts or softirqs disabled. In pre-v5.0 kernels, which
+ * define synchronize_sched(), only code enclosed within rcu_read_lock()
+ * and rcu_read_unlock() are guaranteed to be waited for.
+ *
* Note, however, that RCU callbacks are permitted to run concurrently
* with new RCU read-side critical sections. One way that this can happen
* is via the following sequence of events: (1) CPU 0 enters an RCU
@@ -728,9 +744,11 @@ static inline void rcu_read_unlock(void)
/**
* rcu_read_lock_bh() - mark the beginning of an RCU-bh critical section
*
- * This is equivalent of rcu_read_lock(), but also disables softirqs.
- * Note that anything else that disables softirqs can also serve as
- * an RCU read-side critical section.
+ * This is equivalent to rcu_read_lock(), but also disables softirqs.
+ * Note that anything else that disables softirqs can also serve as an RCU
+ * read-side critical section. However, please note that this equivalence
+ * applies only to v5.0 and later. Before v5.0, rcu_read_lock() and
+ * rcu_read_lock_bh() were unrelated.
*
* Note that rcu_read_lock_bh() and the matching rcu_read_unlock_bh()
* must occur in the same context, for example, it is illegal to invoke
@@ -763,9 +781,12 @@ static inline void rcu_read_unlock_bh(void)
/**
* rcu_read_lock_sched() - mark the beginning of a RCU-sched critical section
*
- * This is equivalent of rcu_read_lock(), but disables preemption.
- * Read-side critical sections can also be introduced by anything else
- * that disables preemption, including local_irq_disable() and friends.
+ * This is equivalent to rcu_read_lock(), but also disables preemption.
+ * Read-side critical sections can also be introduced by anything else that
+ * disables preemption, including local_irq_disable() and friends. However,
+ * please note that the equivalence to rcu_read_lock() applies only to
+ * v5.0 and later. Before v5.0, rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_lock_sched()
+ * were unrelated.
*
* Note that rcu_read_lock_sched() and the matching rcu_read_unlock_sched()
* must occur in the same context, for example, it is illegal to invoke
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 2437960..4b00e4f 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -3059,12 +3059,14 @@ __call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
* period elapses, in other words after all pre-existing RCU read-side
* critical sections have completed. However, the callback function
* might well execute concurrently with RCU read-side critical sections
- * that started after call_rcu() was invoked. RCU read-side critical
- * sections are delimited by rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock(), and
- * may be nested. In addition, regions of code across which interrupts,
- * preemption, or softirqs have been disabled also serve as RCU read-side
- * critical sections. This includes hardware interrupt handlers, softirq
- * handlers, and NMI handlers.
+ * that started after call_rcu() was invoked.
+ *
+ * RCU read-side critical sections are delimited by rcu_read_lock()
+ * and rcu_read_unlock(), and may be nested. In addition, but only in
+ * v5.0 and later, regions of code across which interrupts, preemption,
+ * or softirqs have been disabled also serve as RCU read-side critical
+ * sections. This includes hardware interrupt handlers, softirq handlers,
+ * and NMI handlers.
*
* Note that all CPUs must agree that the grace period extended beyond
* all pre-existing RCU read-side critical section. On systems with more
@@ -3730,10 +3732,12 @@ static int rcu_blocking_is_gp(void)
* read-side critical sections have completed. Note, however, that
* upon return from synchronize_rcu(), the caller might well be executing
* concurrently with new RCU read-side critical sections that began while
- * synchronize_rcu() was waiting. RCU read-side critical sections are
- * delimited by rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock(), and may be nested.
- * In addition, regions of code across which interrupts, preemption, or
- * softirqs have been disabled also serve as RCU read-side critical
+ * synchronize_rcu() was waiting.
+ *
+ * RCU read-side critical sections are delimited by rcu_read_lock()
+ * and rcu_read_unlock(), and may be nested. In addition, but only in
+ * v5.0 and later, regions of code across which interrupts, preemption,
+ * or softirqs have been disabled also serve as RCU read-side critical
* sections. This includes hardware interrupt handlers, softirq handlers,
* and NMI handlers.
*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists