[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210630161036.GA43693@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 17:10:36 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup1: fix leaked context root causing sporadic NULL
deref in LTP
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 11:23:34AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 08:51:57AM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > A fix would be to not leave the stale reference in fc->root as follows:
> > --------------
> > dput(fc->root);
> > + fc->root = NULL;
> > deactivate_locked_super(sb);
> > --------------
> > ...but then we are just open-coding a duplicate of fc_drop_locked() so we
> > simply use that instead.
> As this is unlikely to be a real-world problem both in probability and
> circumstances, I'm applying this to cgroup/for-5.14 instead of
> cgroup/for-5.13-fixes.
FWIW at Arm we've started seeing what appears to be this issue blow up
very frequently in some of our internal LTP CI runs against -next, seems
to be mostly on lower end platforms. We seem to have started finding it
at roughly the same time that the Yocto people did, I guess some other
change made it more likely to trigger. Not exactly real world usage
obviously but it's creating quite a bit of noise in testing which is
disruptive so it'd be good to get it into -next as a fix.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists