[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJWu+oofNcZtg+EAduKzp=yFe5+AYNogvr-V0q3NWyLA_QCRJw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:43:24 -0400
From: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Paul Burton <paulburton@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing: Simplify & fix saved_tgids logic
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 8:31 AM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 17:34:05 -0700
> Paul Burton <paulburton@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> > The tgid_map array records a mapping from pid to tgid, where the index
> > of an entry within the array is the pid & the value stored at that index
> > is the tgid.
> >
> > The saved_tgids_next() function iterates over pointers into the tgid_map
> > array & dereferences the pointers which results in the tgid, but then it
> > passes that dereferenced value to trace_find_tgid() which treats it as a
> > pid & does a further lookup within the tgid_map array. It seems likely
> > that the intent here was to skip over entries in tgid_map for which the
> > recorded tgid is zero, but instead we end up skipping over entries for
> > which the thread group leader hasn't yet had its own tgid recorded in
> > tgid_map.
> >
> > A minimal fix would be to remove the call to trace_find_tgid, turning:
> >
> > if (trace_find_tgid(*ptr))
> >
> > into:
> >
> > if (*ptr)
> >
> > ..but it seems like this logic can be much simpler if we simply let
> > seq_read() iterate over the whole tgid_map array & filter out empty
> > entries by returning SEQ_SKIP from saved_tgids_show(). Here we take that
> > approach, removing the incorrect logic here entirely.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paulburton@...gle.com>
> > Fixes: d914ba37d714 ("tracing: Add support for recording tgid of tasks")
> > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> > Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
> > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> > ---
>
> Joel,
>
> Can you review this please.
Sure thing Steve, will review it today.
thanks,
-Joel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists