[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <19A0D984-2817-44C5-87AE-6C2BF2310671@dubeyko.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 09:49:26 -0700
From: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@...eyko.com>
To: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@...il.com>
Cc: gustavoars@...nel.org, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] hfs: add missing clean-up in hfs_fill_super
> On Jun 29, 2021, at 9:50 PM, Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@...il.com> wrote:
<skipped>
> Thanks for the suggestion. Since the bail and bail_no_root error paths are used before hfs_find_init and after hfs_find_exit are called in the normal execution case, moving hfs_find_exit under the bail label wouldn't work.
>
> Perhaps this can be done by introducing another goto label. Any thoughts on the following?
>
> diff --git a/fs/hfs/super.c b/fs/hfs/super.c
> index 44d07c9e3a7f..12d9bae39363 100644
> --- a/fs/hfs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/hfs/super.c
> @@ -420,14 +420,12 @@ static int hfs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
> if (!res) {
> if (fd.entrylength > sizeof(rec) || fd.entrylength < 0) {
> res = -EIO;
> - goto bail;
> + goto bail_hfs_find;
> }
> hfs_bnode_read(fd.bnode, &rec, fd.entryoffset, fd.entrylength);
> }
> - if (res) {
> - hfs_find_exit(&fd);
> - goto bail_no_root;
> - }
> + if (res)
> + goto bail_hfs_find;
> res = -EINVAL;
> root_inode = hfs_iget(sb, &fd.search_key->cat, &rec);
> hfs_find_exit(&fd);
> @@ -443,6 +441,8 @@ static int hfs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
> /* everything's okay */
> return 0;
>
> +bail_hfs_find:
> + hfs_find_exit(&fd);
> bail_no_root:
> pr_err("get root inode failed\n");
> bail:
Makes sense. Looks good.
Thanks,
Slava.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists