[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210630173358.GD75386@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:33:58 -0400
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, virtio-fs@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH 3/2] fs: simplify get_filesystem_list /
get_all_fs_names
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 07:36:01AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 04:50:48PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > May be we should modify mount_block_root() code so that it does not
> > require that extra "\0". Possibly zero initialize page and that should
> > make sure list_bdev_fs_names() does not have to worry about it.
> >
> > It is possible that a page gets full from the list of filesystems, and
> > last byte on page is terminating null. In that case just zeroing page
> > will not help. We can keep track of some sort of end pointer and make
> > sure we are not searching beyond that for valid filesystem types.
> >
> > end = page + PAGE_SIZE - 1;
> >
> > mount_block_root()
> > {
> > for (p = fs_names; p < end && *p; p += strlen(p)+1) {
> > }
> > }
>
> Maybe. To honest I'd prefer to not even touch this unrelated code given
> how full of landmines it is :)
Agreed. It probably is better to make such changes incrementally.
Given third patch is nice to have cleanup kind of thing, can we first
just merge first two patches to support non-block device filesystems as
rootfs.
We will really like to have a method to properly boot virtiofs as rootfs.
Thanks
Vivek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists