[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <695b2537-28e0-90c4-d516-727dfeead12d@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 08:13:25 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To: Zhenguo Zhao <zhenguo6858@...il.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: n_gsm: delete SABM command frame as requester
On 01. 07. 21, 4:54, Zhenguo Zhao wrote:
> From: Zhenguo Zhao <Zhenguo.Zhao1@...soc.com>
>
> as initiator,it need to send SABM conmmand ,as requester,there is
> no need to send the SABM control frame,it will cause redundant data.
Hi,
is there any document you can refer to? I am still confused so I don't
understand why this didn't matter until now. Maybe you only need to
explain better the whole point behind the introduced initiator/requester
functionality.
In any way, could you use spell checker on the commit log (like "conmmand")?
> Signed-off-by: Zhenguo Zhao <Zhenguo.Zhao1@...soc.com>
> ---
> drivers/tty/n_gsm.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c b/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
> index 5fea02c..e66418b 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
> @@ -3005,8 +3005,9 @@ static int gsmtty_open(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file *filp)
> /* We could in theory open and close before we wait - eg if we get
> a DM straight back. This is ok as that will have caused a hangup */
> tty_port_set_initialized(port, 1);
> - /* Start sending off SABM messages */
> - gsm_dlci_begin_open(dlci);
> + /* Start sending off SABM messages for initiator */
> + if (gsm->initiator)
> + gsm_dlci_begin_open(dlci);
> /* And wait for virtual carrier */
> return tty_port_block_til_ready(port, tty, filp);
> }
>
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists