lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXv+5GNkqHOxv9zXoa3yLh5_FXGUARqXd82W00CBTnHS_BFPw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Jul 2021 15:21:11 +0800
From:   Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
To:     Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>
Cc:     Sean Wang <sean.wang@...nel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        zhiyong.tao@...iatek.com,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: mediatek: Fix fallback behavior for bias_set_combo

On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 2:55 PM Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> Some pin doesn't support PUPD register, if it fails and fallbacks with
> bias_set_combo case, it will call mtk_pinconf_bias_set_pupd_r1_r0() to
> modify the PUPD pin again.
>
> Since the general bias set are either PU/PD or PULLSEL/PULLEN, try
> bias_set or bias_set_rev1 for this fallback case.
>
> Fixes: 81bd1579b43e ("pinctrl: mediatek: Fix fallback call path")
> Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c | 9 ++++++---
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c
> index 5b3b048725cc8..0cdff487836fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c
> @@ -926,9 +926,12 @@ int mtk_pinconf_adv_pull_set(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
>                         if (err)
>                                 return err;
>                 } else if (hw->soc->bias_set_combo) {
> -                       err = hw->soc->bias_set_combo(hw, desc, pullup, arg);
> -                       if (err)
> -                               return err;
> +                       err = mtk_pinconf_bias_set_rev1(hw, desc, pullup);
> +                       if (err) {
> +                               err = mtk_pinconf_bias_set(hw, desc, pullup);
> +                               if (err)
> +                                       return err;

You don't need to nest this. If mtk_pinconf_bias_set_rev1() succeeds,
err would be 0 and the following if blocks would all be skipped. So:

err = mtk_pinconf_bias_set_rev1();
if (err)
        err = mtk_pinconf_bias_set();
if (err)
        return err;

Moreover, maybe you should rework the test for hw->soc->bias_set_combo,
as it is no longer relevant to the code within the if block?


ChenYu

> +                       }
>                 } else {
>                         return -ENOTSUPP;
>                 }
> --
> 2.32.0.93.g670b81a890-goog
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> Linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ