lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 1 Jul 2021 10:41:38 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
        Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
        Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
        Takashi YOSHII <takasi-y@....dti.ne.jp>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 v2] sh: fix READ/WRITE redefinition warnings

) Hi Adrian,

On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 9:36 PM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
<glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> On 6/30/21 9:33 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 6/30/21 2:36 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> >> On 6/28/21 12:05 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >>> kernel.h defines READ and WRITE, so rename the SH math-emu macros
> >>> to MREAD and MWRITE.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes these warnings:
> >>>
> >>> ../arch/sh/math-emu/math.c:54: warning: "WRITE" redefined
> >>>    54 | #define WRITE(d,a) ({if(put_user(d, (typeof (d) __user *)a)) return -EFAULT;})
> >>> In file included from ../arch/sh/math-emu/math.c:10:
> >>> ../include/linux/kernel.h:37: note: this is the location of the previous definition
> >>>    37 | #define WRITE   1
> >>> ../arch/sh/math-emu/math.c:55: warning: "READ" redefined
> >>>    55 | #define READ(d,a) ({if(get_user(d, (typeof (d) __user *)a)) return -EFAULT;})
> >>> In file included from ../arch/sh/math-emu/math.c:10:
> >>> ../include/linux/kernel.h:36: note: this is the location of the previous definition
> >>>    36 | #define READ   0
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: 4b565680d163 ("sh: math-emu support")
> >>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> >>> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
> >>> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
> >>> Cc: linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
> >>> Cc: Takashi YOSHII <takasi-y@....dti.ne.jp>
> >>> Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
> >>> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> >>> ---
> >>> v2: renumber patches, otherwise no change;
> >>>
> >>>  arch/sh/math-emu/math.c |   44 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> >>>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

> >> This one no longer applies to Linus' tree:
> >>
> >> glaubitz@...e54:/data/home/glaubitz/linux> git am ../sh-patches-2021/\[PATCH\ 3_3\ v2\]\ sh\:\ fix\ READ_WRITE\ redefinition\ warnings.eml
> >> Applying: sh: fix READ/WRITE redefinition warnings
> >> error: patch failed: arch/sh/math-emu/math.c:51
> >> error: arch/sh/math-emu/math.c: patch does not apply
> >> Patch failed at 0001 sh: fix READ/WRITE redefinition warnings
> >> hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
> >> When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
> >> If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
> >> To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
> >> glaubitz@...e54:/data/home/glaubitz/linux>
> >
> > OK. Thanks for all of the testing.
>
> I'll report back with the other patch applied that Geert mentioned from linux-next before this one.

FTR, I booted all three successfully on qemu/rts7751r2d and on physical landisk.


> FWIW, there are some warnings when building the SH-7785LCR configuration:
>
> In file included from ./arch/sh/include/asm/hw_irq.h:6,
>                  from ./include/linux/irq.h:591,
>                  from ./include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17,
>                  from ./arch/sh/include/asm/hardirq.h:9,
>                  from ./include/linux/hardirq.h:11,
>                  from ./include/linux/interrupt.h:11,
>                  from ./include/linux/serial_core.h:13,
>                  from ./include/linux/serial_sci.h:6,
>                  from arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh4a/setup-sh7785.c:10:
> ./include/linux/sh_intc.h:100:63: warning: division 'sizeof (void *) / sizeof (void)' does not compute the number of array elements [-Wsizeof-pointer-div]
>   100 | #define _INTC_ARRAY(a) a, __same_type(a, NULL) ? 0 : sizeof(a)/sizeof(*a)
>       |                                                               ^
> ./include/linux/sh_intc.h:107:9: note: in expansion of macro '_INTC_ARRAY'
>   107 |         _INTC_ARRAY(sense_regs), _INTC_ARRAY(ack_regs), \
>       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~
> ./include/linux/sh_intc.h:124:15: note: in expansion of macro 'INTC_HW_DESC'
>   124 |         .hw = INTC_HW_DESC(vectors, groups, mask_regs,                  \
>       |               ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh4a/setup-sh7785.c:478:8: note: in expansion of macro 'DECLARE_INTC_DESC'
>   478 | static DECLARE_INTC_DESC(intc_desc, "sh7785", vectors, groups,
>       |        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A while ago, I had a look into fixing them, but it was non-trivial.
The issue is that the macros are sometimes used with NULL pointer arrays.
The __same_type() check in

    #define _INTC_ARRAY(a) a, __same_type(a, NULL) ? 0 : sizeof(a)/sizeof(*a)

is supposed to catch that, but modern compilers seem to evaluate the
non-taken branch, too, leading to the warning.

Anyone with a suggestion? (CCing the multi-compiler guru)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ