[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXoWZMj8+LhUPSpqa4t-G1WrW-wfOy3XzEDe0ihSKQkCw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 11:07:25 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
Cc: USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Adam Ford-BE <aford@...conembedded.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] usb: renesas_usbhs: Enable support for more than two clks
Hi Adam,
Thanks for your patch!
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 7:30 PM Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com> wrote:
> The RZ/G2 boards expect there to be an external clock reference for
> USBHS controller, but this could be set by a programmable clock.
> For those devices using a programmable clock, there need to be two
> additional clocks beyond the internal reference clocks:
>
> rcar-usb2-clock-sel to specify we using an external clock, and
> the external reference clock itself.
Something is missing in the above sentence?
>
> Make this driver dynamically enable all the clocks assigned to it
> instead of only enabling the first one or two clocks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/renesas_usbhs/common.c b/drivers/usb/renesas_usbhs/common.c
> index 3af91b2b8f76..255e4bd68ed3 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/renesas_usbhs/common.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/renesas_usbhs/common.c
> @@ -297,6 +297,8 @@ static bool usbhsc_is_multi_clks(struct usbhs_priv *priv)
>
> static int usbhsc_clk_get(struct device *dev, struct usbhs_priv *priv)
> {
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> if (!usbhsc_is_multi_clks(priv))
> return 0;
>
> @@ -309,11 +311,13 @@ static int usbhsc_clk_get(struct device *dev, struct usbhs_priv *priv)
> * To backward compatibility with old DT, this driver checks the return
> * value if it's -ENOENT or not.
> */
> - priv->clks[1] = of_clk_get(dev_of_node(dev), 1);
> - if (PTR_ERR(priv->clks[1]) == -ENOENT)
> - priv->clks[1] = NULL;
> - else if (IS_ERR(priv->clks[1]))
> - return PTR_ERR(priv->clks[1]);
> + for (i = 1; i < ARRAY_SIZE(priv->clks); i++) {
> + priv->clks[1] = of_clk_get(dev->of_node, i);
> + if (PTR_ERR(priv->clks[i]) == -ENOENT)
> + priv->clks[i] = NULL;
> + else if (IS_ERR(priv->clks[i]))
> + return PTR_ERR(priv->clks[i]);
> + }
This is identical to the current code, as ARRAY_SIZE(priv->clks) == 2.
Probably you wanted to increase usbhs_priv.clks[], too?
Does it make sense to start using the clk_bulk*() API?
>
> return 0;
> }
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists