| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CA+EHjTws5L8Nti_Pr7TYtECZXGbgOHiNQsoc5ez1Ncf7yaCQaw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 10:44:59 +0100
From: Fuad Tabba <tabba@...gle.com>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>
Cc: maz@...nel.org, salil.mehta@...wei.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@....com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, corbet@....net, catalin.marinas@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, will@...nel.org,
jonathan.cameron@...wei.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] KVM: arm64: Replace power_off with mp_state in
struct kvm_vcpu_arch
Hi Jean-Philippe,
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 4:54 PM Jean-Philippe Brucker
<jean-philippe@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> In order to add a new "suspend" power state, replace power_off with
> mp_state in struct kvm_vcpu_arch. Factor the vcpu_off() function while
> we're here.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 6 ++++--
> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
> arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c | 19 ++++++-------------
> 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 7cd7d5c8c4bc..55a04f4d5919 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -340,8 +340,8 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
> u32 mdscr_el1;
> } guest_debug_preserved;
>
> - /* vcpu power-off state */
> - bool power_off;
> + /* vcpu power state (runnable, stopped, halted) */
Should the comment be, for clarity, something along the lines of
KVM_MP_STATE_(STOPPED, RUNNABLE, HALTED), or maybe "a valid struct
kvm_mp_state", if you think other states might be added in the future?
Thanks,
/fuad
> + u32 mp_state;
>
> /* Don't run the guest (internal implementation need) */
> bool pause;
> @@ -720,6 +720,8 @@ int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
> int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
> +void kvm_arm_vcpu_power_off(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +bool kvm_arm_vcpu_is_off(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>
> /* Guest/host FPSIMD coordination helpers */
> int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index e720148232a0..bcc24adb9c0a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -435,21 +435,22 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> vcpu->cpu = -1;
> }
>
> -static void vcpu_power_off(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +void kvm_arm_vcpu_power_off(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> - vcpu->arch.power_off = true;
> + vcpu->arch.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_STOPPED;
> kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_SLEEP, vcpu);
> kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
> }
>
> +bool kvm_arm_vcpu_is_off(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + return vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_STOPPED;
> +}
> +
> int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_get_mpstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct kvm_mp_state *mp_state)
> {
> - if (vcpu->arch.power_off)
> - mp_state->mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_STOPPED;
> - else
> - mp_state->mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE;
> -
> + mp_state->mp_state = vcpu->arch.mp_state;
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -460,10 +461,10 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_mpstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>
> switch (mp_state->mp_state) {
> case KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE:
> - vcpu->arch.power_off = false;
> + vcpu->arch.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE;
> break;
> case KVM_MP_STATE_STOPPED:
> - vcpu_power_off(vcpu);
> + kvm_arm_vcpu_power_off(vcpu);
> break;
> default:
> ret = -EINVAL;
> @@ -483,7 +484,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
> {
> bool irq_lines = *vcpu_hcr(v) & (HCR_VI | HCR_VF);
> return ((irq_lines || kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq(v))
> - && !v->arch.power_off && !v->arch.pause);
> + && !kvm_arm_vcpu_is_off(v) && !v->arch.pause);
> }
>
> bool kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> @@ -643,10 +644,10 @@ static void vcpu_req_sleep(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> struct rcuwait *wait = kvm_arch_vcpu_get_wait(vcpu);
>
> rcuwait_wait_event(wait,
> - (!vcpu->arch.power_off) &&(!vcpu->arch.pause),
> + !kvm_arm_vcpu_is_off(vcpu) && !vcpu->arch.pause,
> TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
>
> - if (vcpu->arch.power_off || vcpu->arch.pause) {
> + if (kvm_arm_vcpu_is_off(vcpu) || vcpu->arch.pause) {
> /* Awaken to handle a signal, request we sleep again later. */
> kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_SLEEP, vcpu);
> }
> @@ -1087,9 +1088,9 @@ static int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> * Handle the "start in power-off" case.
> */
> if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_POWER_OFF, vcpu->arch.features))
> - vcpu_power_off(vcpu);
> + kvm_arm_vcpu_power_off(vcpu);
> else
> - vcpu->arch.power_off = false;
> + vcpu->arch.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE;
>
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c
> index db4056ecccfd..24b4a2265dbd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c
> @@ -52,13 +52,6 @@ static unsigned long kvm_psci_vcpu_suspend(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return PSCI_RET_SUCCESS;
> }
>
> -static void kvm_psci_vcpu_off(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> -{
> - vcpu->arch.power_off = true;
> - kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_SLEEP, vcpu);
> - kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
> -}
> -
> static unsigned long kvm_psci_vcpu_on(struct kvm_vcpu *source_vcpu)
> {
> struct vcpu_reset_state *reset_state;
> @@ -78,7 +71,7 @@ static unsigned long kvm_psci_vcpu_on(struct kvm_vcpu *source_vcpu)
> */
> if (!vcpu)
> return PSCI_RET_INVALID_PARAMS;
> - if (!vcpu->arch.power_off) {
> + if (!kvm_arm_vcpu_is_off(vcpu)) {
> if (kvm_psci_version(source_vcpu, kvm) != KVM_ARM_PSCI_0_1)
> return PSCI_RET_ALREADY_ON;
> else
> @@ -107,7 +100,7 @@ static unsigned long kvm_psci_vcpu_on(struct kvm_vcpu *source_vcpu)
> */
> smp_wmb();
>
> - vcpu->arch.power_off = false;
> + vcpu->arch.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE;
> kvm_vcpu_wake_up(vcpu);
>
> return PSCI_RET_SUCCESS;
> @@ -142,7 +135,7 @@ static unsigned long kvm_psci_vcpu_affinity_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> mpidr = kvm_vcpu_get_mpidr_aff(tmp);
> if ((mpidr & target_affinity_mask) == target_affinity) {
> matching_cpus++;
> - if (!tmp->arch.power_off)
> + if (!kvm_arm_vcpu_is_off(tmp))
> return PSCI_0_2_AFFINITY_LEVEL_ON;
> }
> }
> @@ -168,7 +161,7 @@ static void kvm_prepare_system_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 type)
> * re-initialized.
> */
> kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, tmp, vcpu->kvm)
> - tmp->arch.power_off = true;
> + tmp->arch.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_STOPPED;
> kvm_make_all_cpus_request(vcpu->kvm, KVM_REQ_SLEEP);
>
> memset(&vcpu->run->system_event, 0, sizeof(vcpu->run->system_event));
> @@ -237,7 +230,7 @@ static int kvm_psci_0_2_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> val = kvm_psci_vcpu_suspend(vcpu);
> break;
> case PSCI_0_2_FN_CPU_OFF:
> - kvm_psci_vcpu_off(vcpu);
> + kvm_arm_vcpu_power_off(vcpu);
> val = PSCI_RET_SUCCESS;
> break;
> case PSCI_0_2_FN_CPU_ON:
> @@ -350,7 +343,7 @@ static int kvm_psci_0_1_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> switch (psci_fn) {
> case KVM_PSCI_FN_CPU_OFF:
> - kvm_psci_vcpu_off(vcpu);
> + kvm_arm_vcpu_power_off(vcpu);
> val = PSCI_RET_SUCCESS;
> break;
> case KVM_PSCI_FN_CPU_ON:
> --
> 2.31.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> kvmarm mailing list
> kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
Powered by blists - more mailing lists