[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YN2twnTaJvZTivGK@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 12:57:54 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: 권오훈 <ohoono.kwon@...sung.com>
Cc: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"konrad.wilk@...cle.com" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"ohkwon1043@...il.com" <ohkwon1043@...il.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: cleancache: fix potential race in cleancache apis
On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 05:56:50PM +0900, 권오훈 wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 07:58:36AM +0200, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 02:06:44PM +0900, 권오훈 wrote:
> > > We are using Cleancache APIs for our proprietary feature in Samsung.
> > > As Wilcox mentioned, however, there is no cleancache backend in current kernel
> > > mainline.
> > > So if the race patch shall be accepted, then it seems unnecessary to patch
> > > previous stable kernels.
> > >
> > > Meanwhile, I personally think cleancache API still has potential to be a good
> > > material when used with new arising technologies such as pmem or NVMe.
> > >
> > > So I suggest to postpone removing cleancache for a while.
> >
> > If there are no in-kernel users, it needs to be removed. If you rely on
> > this, wonderful, please submit your code as soon as possible.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> >
> We will discuss internally and see if we can submit our feature.
You have two months. I'll submit the removal then if no new backend has
shown up.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists