linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] s390/vfio-ap: r/w lock for PQAP interception handler function pointer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c19442b4-8e8f-0cea-c47b-af62226022f2@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Jul 2021 12:28:08 -0400
From:   Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     cohuck@...hat.com, pasic@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, jjherne@...ux.ibm.com,
        jgg@...dia.com, alex.williamson@...hat.com, kwankhede@...dia.com,
        frankja@...ux.ibm.com, david@...hat.com, imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com,
        hca@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] s390/vfio-ap: r/w lock for PQAP interception
 handler function pointer



On 7/1/21 11:25 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 30.06.21 17:18, Tony Krowiak wrote:
>> I assumed that this patch would get queued along with the other one 
>> in this series,
>> but it looks like that was an erroneous assumption. Should this also 
>> be queued?
>
> Sorry, this is on my todo list.

That's fine, it is probably a good thing it wasn't merged. I found a 
problem with the patch and am working on a replacement. I'll be posting 
it soon.