lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 1 Jul 2021 11:15:37 -0700
From:   Paul Burton <paulburton@...gle.com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] tracing: Resize tgid_map to pid_max, not
 PID_MAX_DEFAULT

Hi Steven,

On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 02:12:21PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu,  1 Jul 2021 10:24:07 -0700
> Paul Burton <paulburton@...gle.com> wrote:
> 
> > +static int *trace_find_tgid_ptr(int pid)
> > +{
> > +	// Pairs with the smp_store_release in set_tracer_flag() to ensure that
> > +	// if we observe a non-NULL tgid_map then we also observe the correct
> > +	// tgid_map_max.
> 
> BTW, it's against the Linux kernel coding style to use // for comments.
> 
> I can take this patch, but I need to change this to:
> 
> 	/*
> 	 * Pairs with the smp_store_release in set_tracer_flag() to ensure that
> 	 * if we observe a non-NULL tgid_map then we also observe the correct
> 	 * tgid_map_max.
> 	 */
> 
> Same with the other comments. Please follow coding style that can be
> found in:
> 
>    Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
> 
> And see section 8 on Commenting.

Yeah, sorry about that - I should know better having been a maintainer
in a former life...

Just to confirm - are you happy to fix those up when applying or should
I send a v3?

Thanks,
    Paul

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ