linux-kernel - Re: [patch 108/192] mm: zram: amend SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT on zspage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YN6ogJbnI46hnjgk@google.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Jul 2021 22:47:44 -0700
From:   Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To:     Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@...il.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        mm-commits@...r.kernel.org,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@...soc.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 108/192] mm: zram: amend SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT on
 zspage_cachep

On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 10:45:09AM +0800, Zhaoyang Huang wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 10:56 PM Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 06:52:58PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > From: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@...soc.com>
> > > Subject: mm: zram: amend SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT on zspage_cachep
> > >
> > > Zspage_cachep is found be merged with other kmem cache during test, which
> > > is not good for debug things (zs_pool->zspage_cachep present to be another
> > > kmem cache in memory dumpfile).  It is also neccessary to do so as
> > > shrinker has been registered for zspage.
> > >
> > > Amending this flag can help kernel to calculate SLAB_RECLAIMBLE correctly.
> > >
> > > Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1623137297-29685-1-git-send-email-huangzhaoyang@gmail.com
> > > Signed-off-by: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@...soc.com>
> > > Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
> > > Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> >
> > Sorry for the late. I don't think this is correct.
> >
> > It's true "struct zspage" can be freed by zsmalloc's compaction registerred
> > by slab shrinker so tempted to make it SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT. However, it's
> > quite limited to work only when objects in the zspage are heavily fragmented.
> > Once the compaction is done, zspage are never discardable until objects are
> > fragmented again. It means it could hurt other reclaimable slab page reclaiming
> > since the zspage slab object pins the page.
> IMHO, kmem cache's reclaiming is NOT affected by SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT
> . This flag just affects kmem cache merge[1], the slab page's migrate
> type[2] and the page's statistics. Actually, zspage's cache DO merged
> with others even without SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT currently, which maybe
> cause zspage's object will NEVER be discarded.(SLAB_MERGE_SAME
> introduce confusions as people believe the cache will merge with
> others when it set and vice versa)
> 
> [1]
>  struct kmem_cache *find_mergeable(size_t size, size_t align, unsigned
> long flags, const char *name, void (*ctor)(void *))
> ...
>     if ((flags & SLAB_MERGE_SAME) != (s->flags & SLAB_MERGE_SAME))
>      continue;
> 
> [2]
> if (s->flags & SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT)
>     s->allocflags |= __GFP_RECLAIMABLE;

That's the point here. With SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT, page allocator
try to allocate pages from MIGRATE_RECLAIMABLE with belief those
objects are easily reclaimable. Say a page has object A, B, C, D
and E. A-D are easily reclaimable but E is hard. What happens is
VM couldn't reclaim the page in the end due to E even though it
already reclaimed A-D. And the such fragmenation could be spread
out entire MIGRATE_RECLAIMABLE pageblocks over time.
That's why I'd like to put zspage into MIGRATE_UNMOVALBE from the
beginning since I don't think it's easily reclaimble once compaction
is done.