[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANpmjNN6D7MQJN5oDuLzmG3wxuFvc-ORBoHPLPhWo+f6cOH2cA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 10:51:08 +0200
From: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: Add compile-time asserts for siginfo_t offsets
On Wed, 26 May 2021 at 20:29, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 07:50:41PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 May 2021 at 19:42, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > Hi Marco,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 09:07:34PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> > > > To help catch ABI breaks at compile-time, add compile-time assertions to
> > > > verify the siginfo_t layout.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 2 files changed, 72 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > Do you want me to queue this patch in the arm64 tree, or is the series all
> > > going together via another route?
> >
> > I think Eric will queue them together with a bunch of other cleanups,
> > because as-is these patches are out-of-date as of:
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=a0e31f3a38e77612ed8967aaad28db6d3ee674b5
>
> Ok, thanks. I will ignore this then :)
Eric, are these static_assert patches being sent this merge-window
along with the other cleanups?
Thanks,
-- Marco
Powered by blists - more mailing lists