[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+i-1C0NADVWC+0tiRTMACqupGpGzK-QZ3sciZq=AYUJL802og@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 11:44:06 +0200
From: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sandipan Das <sandipan@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG soft lockup] Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3] bpf: Propagate stack
bounds to registers in atomics w/ BPF_FETCH
On Thu, 1 Jul 2021 at 16:15, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 04:32:03PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> > Yes, I think I just found the issue. We aren't looking at the correct BPF
> > instruction when checking the IMM value.
>
> great, nice catch! :-) that fixes it for me..
Ahh, nice. +1 thanks for taking a look!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists