[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <754d23ba-c53f-52e8-9ebd-9f1b2611cc71@canonical.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 14:04:17 +0100
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
Florian Schilhabel <florian.c.schilhabel@...glemail.com>
Cc: "linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev" <linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: staging: rtl8712: dead code on flush_signals_thread call in
r8712_cmd_thread()
Hi,
Static analysis by Coverity has detected a call to
flush_signals_thread() that is never executed. If it is removed it
won't affect the current behavior, however I'm pretty sure the call was
intentionally placed in the code at the end of a while loop so I believe
there is something a little dubious with the current code.
The analysis by Coverity is as follows:
384 goto _next;
385 }
Structurally dead code (UNREACHABLE)
unreachable: This code cannot be reached: flush_signals_thread();.
386 flush_signals_thread();
387 }
Any ideas?
Colin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists