lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANAwSgSfzwYTtAFeKSxGUW=rtON42AObrXGsRTb31WevFKJQLA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 3 Jul 2021 00:43:19 +0530
From:   Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
To:     Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
Cc:     Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFCv1 6/8] phy: amlogic: meson8b-usb2: Use phy reset callback function

Hi Martin,

On Mon, 28 Jun 2021 at 01:55, Martin Blumenstingl
<martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Anand,
>
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 10:07 PM Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com> wrote:
> [...]
> > Sorry for the delay.
> > We could switch the reset logic to
> > *devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive* as below
> > to fix the reset line, since both the dwc2 c90c0000.usb and c9040000.usb
> > will have their own context to reset control register, it means the
> > reset line is not share
> > between two USB PHY nodes.
> This is something I don't understand.
> As discussed in our previous mails reset_control_reset in case of the
> USB PHY driver (which uses the RESET_USB_OTG reset line for *both*
> PHYs) is equivalent to the following code in the vendor kernel:
>   aml_cbus_update_bits(0x1102, 0x1<<2, 0x1<<2)
>
> We have two PHYs but only one reset line. So in my own words I
> describe the reset line as being shared.
>
> >
> > -       priv->reset = devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> > +       priv->reset = devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive(&pdev->dev,
> > +                                                               "reset");
> Have you boot-tested this?
> Without any .dts changes this will return NULL because there's no
> reset-names = "reset"; in the .dts(i).
> If you replace "reset" with NULL then I assume that the second PHY
> will fail to obtain the reset line because it's shared between two
> devices but we're trying to obtain it exclusively for both (PHYs).
>
Thanks for your review comments.

I have always tested with both the phy enable and with proper DTS changes.
Yes, it gives false-positive results while initialization of the USB PHY.
Odroid C2 it will pass but on Odroid C1 it will fail kid off.

But it seems to me that the order of the PHY reset is kind of a problem.

Thanks for looking into my changes.
>
> Best regards,
> Martin

Thanks
-Anand

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ