[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wg80je=K7madF4e7WrRNp37e3qh6y10Svhdc7O8SZ_-8g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 12:42:57 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 1/2] asm-generic: rework PCI I/O space access
On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 6:48 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> A rework for PCI I/O space access from Niklas Schnelle:
I pulled this, but then I ended up unpulling.
I don't absolutely _hate_ the concept, but I really find this to be
very unpalatable:
#if !defined(inb) && !defined(_inb)
#define _inb _inb
static inline u8 _inb(unsigned long addr)
{
#ifdef PCI_IOBASE
u8 val;
__io_pbr();
val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
__io_par(val);
return val;
#else
WARN_ONCE(1, "No I/O port support\n");
return ~0;
#endif
}
#endif
because honestly, the notion of a run-time warning for a compile-time
"this cannot work" is just wrong.
If the platform doesn't have inb/outb, and you compile some driver
that uses them, you don't want a run-time warning. Particularly since
in many cases nobody will ever run it, and the main use case was to do
compile-testing across a wide number of platforms.
So if the platform doesn't have inb/outb, they simply should not be
declared, and there should be a *compile-time* error. That is
literally a lot more useful, and it avoids this extra code.
Extra code that not only doesn't add value, but that actually
*subtracts* value is not code I really want to pull.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists