lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbnujCU1H6VmpyZ7p6bMFG0s8PzT-O4GetLUXA21N63qg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 2 Jul 2021 23:46:16 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Vincent Pelletier <plr.vincent@...il.com>
Cc:     Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: gpiochip_lock_as_irq on pins without FLAG_REQUESTED: bug or
 feature ?

On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 12:48 PM Vincent Pelletier <plr.vincent@...il.com> wrote:

> gpiochip_lock_as_irq,
(...)
> Actually my question came from yet another misunderstanding on my side:
> I expected this function to act as an exclusive access control (because
> of the "lock" in the name), but I then realised my assumption is wrong.

Well it locks its use to be compliant with being used for IRQ.
So it cannot be turned into an output for example. While reading
its value as input is fine.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ