[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YN/0rmO0p6IJcImj@google.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2021 05:25:02 +0000
From: Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] percpu: flush tlb after pcpu_depopulate_chunk()
On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 10:14:44PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 03, 2021 at 04:04:49AM +0000, Dennis Zhou wrote:
> > Prior to "percpu: implement partial chunk depopulation",
> > pcpu_depopulate_chunk() was called only on the destruction path. This
> > meant the virtual address range was on its way back to vmalloc which
> > will handle flushing the tlbs for us.
> >
> > However, now that we call pcpu_depopulate_chunk() during the active
> > lifecycle of a chunk, we need to flush the tlb as well otherwise we can
> > end up accessing the wrong page through an invalid tlb mapping.
> >
> > This was reported in [1].
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210702191140.GA3166599@roeck-us.net/
> >
> > Fixes: f183324133ea ("percpu: implement partial chunk depopulation")
> > Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>
>
> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
>
> Thanks!
> Guenter
>
I updated the tag and have applied this to for-5.14-fixes so it can get
some for-next exposure before I send a fix to Linus.
Thanks for setting up the super easy repro! It made debugging this
significantly easier.
Thanks,
Dennis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists