[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72=eHs870jbmZz8CUEUuN2NOCaKS9-F6-jAb0QXje2x1Eg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2021 23:17:50 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
rust-for-linux <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Geoffrey Thomas <geofft@...reload.com>,
Finn Behrens <me@...enk.de>,
Adam Bratschi-Kaye <ark.email@...il.com>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/17] kallsyms: support big kernel symbols (2-byte lengths)
On Sun, Jul 4, 2021 at 11:05 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> What happened to my suggestion from last time of encoding symbols < 128
> as 0-127 and symbols larger than that as (data[0] - 128) * 256 +
> data[1]) ?
Nothing, sorry, we focused on other parts (e.g. the allocation panics)
during this iteration. I can take a look for v2.
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists