[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YOFWWOb7Dq92uaat@unreal>
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2021 09:34:00 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc: "Marciniszyn, Mike" <mike.marciniszyn@...nelisnetworks.com>,
"Dalessandro, Dennis" <dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"Pine, Kevin" <kevin.pine@...nelisnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next] RDMA/rdmavt: Decouple QP and SGE lists
allocations
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 08:19:34PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 09:59:48PM +0000, Marciniszyn, Mike wrote:
<...>
> I certainly object to this idea that the driver assumes userspace will
> never move its IRQs off the local because it has wrongly hardwired a
> numa locality to the wrong object.
It makes me wonder how should we progress with my patch.
Thanks
>
> Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists